Tuesday, August 04, 2009



Know a man by the company he keeps

Obama supports "Jewish conspiracy" theorists:
"[Obama] sent his no. 2 woman at the White House, Valerie Jarrett, to speak at the racist hate-fest staged over the Fourth of July weekend by the Islamic Society of North America, an unindicted co-conspirator in a case involving the funding of the Hamas terror group. At the ISNA conference, pure hate speech and Islamic anti-Semitism were promoted, and the Obama administration was there.

Imam Warith Deen Umar spoke about his books, Jews for Salaam: The Straight Path to Global Peace, and Judaiology. Umar, the former head of New York prisons' Muslim chaplain program, repeatedly described Jewish conspiracies to control the world: "Why do this small number of people," he asked, "have control of the world? ...There's some people in the world says no Holocaust even happened. Some of their leaders say no Holocaust even happened. Well it did happen. These people were punished. They were punished for a reason, because they were serially disobedient to Allah."

Source

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

I'm sure that the overwhelming majority of leftist jews, all of whom voted for Obama, will simply ignor this as they do with most factual information they dislike. Of course, if a non-Muslim had said these same things, every lawyer in the country would be on the march to court!

Who knows. Maybe these Muslims have a point that we're being kept from seeing or discussing? Hmmm...

Anonymous said...

Have you glossed over the fact that he sent a woman to talk to them?

That's a huge 'fuck you' to these people, you know how the islamic countries see women!

I bet her outfit even showed her calves! The men could probably barely restrain themselves in such a skinfest.

Anonymous said...

I'm sure glad i wasn't a nearby goat after that meeting!!

jonjayray said...

LOL

I like that comment by Anon 8:44!

Anonymous said...

Anon 3:56, good post which reminds me of a thought I had about muslim laws which require women to be totally covered. Does this imply that their men are so weak and unable to control themselves that they have to cover their women? It says a lot about them.

Anonymous said...

It reflects the jealous possessiveness of the men who own the women they cover up so that other men cannot be tempted to take their possessions or render them "soiled goods".