Thursday, August 27, 2009



A Communist-sympathizing Obama apparatchik is behind the attack on Glenn Beck

We read:
"Is Glenn Beck finished?" is the headline over an article on a left-wing website, insisting that a campaign against Beck's Fox News Channel program has cost him 36 advertisers and that his show may be cancelled as a result. The campaign against Beck is being waged by a group called Color of Change, whose co-founder, Van Jones, is now Obama's green-jobs czar.

Not coincidentally, Beck has repeatedly singled out Van Jones for criticism, citing evidence of his communist past. The source of this evidence is New Zealand blogger Trevor Loudon, the same researcher who originally unearthed the fact that Obama's mysterious mentor "Frank" in Obama's book Dreams from My Father was Communist Party member Frank Marshall Davis. We confirmed that identification with a separate source and ran with the story last year, even obtaining the 600-page FBI file on Davis. It also came out that Davis was a sex pervert, doper, and pornographer.

Trevor Loudon, who deserves far more credit than he gets for smoking out the communists in and around the Obama Administration, broke the Van Jones story back on April 6 and has run several follow-ups. Among other things, he revealed that Jones was a leading member of a Marxist organization known by the acronym STORM, which means Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement. A 96-page history of the organization mentions how several STORM members had traveled to Cuba in the summer of 1999 as part of the Venceremos Brigade. This is the group that was originally sponsored by the Castro regime and the Weather Underground.

It seems clear that Jones has undergone, with powerful sponsors and benefactors, an extreme makeover. Beck, to his credit, is trying to peel away the protective cover. He needs our support to remain on the air and pursue this story. The trail will most certainly lead beyond Jones himself.

Source

30 comments:

Bumper said...

The latest cable ratings show the entire Fox crew, including Beck, ahead of MSNBC and CNN. Appears that there aren't any viewers repercussions for telling the truth. The advertisers will be back 'cause that's where the viewers are.

Anonymous said...

It turns out that many of the 36 companies boasted by the protesters didn't even have slots on his show to begin with.

Glenn is not going away... his ratings are still on the upswing.


~Darko

G.S. Patton III said...

Van Jones's communist "past"? Comrade Jones is "still" an avowed, self-proclaimed communist. And only a total fool whould believe the Obummer administration didn't know this. In fact, Jones and Obummer go back a long way.

As for Beck, he (like Lou Dobbs is to CNN) is Fox's #1 money earner, which means he's not going anywhere. Sean Hannity and Bill O' Buffoon combined can't reach Beck's numbers. He is "the only" person on TV (and Limbaugh on radio) that is trying to wake the American people up and make them realize that they're losing their country, their government, and their liberty.

The only question is, are the American people still capable of waking up, or are they more interested in American Idol.

Anonymous said...

Did any one in the media happen to mention that Obama started his “vacation” on the first day of Ramadan? He would be fasting for that week. Did he leave Washington so no one would notice?
Hmmmm???

Mongo said...

"The only question is, are the American people still capable of waking up, or are they more interested in American Idol."

The American people woke up on November 4, 2008.

Anonymous said...

Acorn woke the dead to vote.

Bobby said...

Hey G.S. Patton III said..., I agree with most of what you said, but I think The O'reilly Factor is the #1 show on cable news. Bill is really fair and balanced, and that's why the people like him, when they go to The O' Factor they don't want to get ideology, just the news with commentary from both sides. Beck is great too, but he has a different style.

Anonymous said...

Mongo, what happened on 11/4/08 was the cause for the coming American Revolution II.

Mr. Mongo To You said...

"Mongo, what happened on 11/4/08 was the cause for the coming American Revolution II."

So, are you promoting armed insurrection? Sounds treasonous to me.

Anonymous said...

"So, are you promoting armed insurrection? Sounds treasonous to me."

No, i'm promoting armed revolution! It's time we rid this country of the leftist filth that has infected us for far too long. So Mango, perhaps you'd better start packing! Or, better yet, stay behind and wait for the "cleansing".

Use the Name, Luke said...

Mongo,

That's what American Revolution I was; Treason against the Crown.

Perhaps you remember these words?

"But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."

Mongo said...

Hey, that is what elections are for, dickwads. I have suffered for 8 years under the Bush regime. Now, it is your turn to suffer, if you have the balls.

Phil In Cow Town said...

Yeah, it's amazing how fast they go from "you have to support the president" to "it's ass kicking time!" when their guy doesn't get elected.

If you don't like Obama winning, well blame Palin, she's the one who cost McCain the election.

Anonymous said...

dumbass..mccain lost because he would not take on the douchbag baroke odamna. Palin is a great lady..what women do the left have? the impotent hillarie, palooser, boxer ? what a bunch of morons.

Bobby said...

Phil, if Palin had run alone I'm sure she might have beaten Obama, at least it would have been a very close race. Palin represents the common man and woman while Obama represents the celebrity, the elite, the pseudo-intellectual jerks from the Ivy League.

Mongo said...

"Palin represents the common man and woman"

She actually represents the right wing beauty pageant crowd. Not much of a base there, Bob.

Phil In Cow Town said...

Palin completely cost him the election. The only thing McCain had was that he had more experience than Obama, then he threw away that advantage by choosing the only person in the country with less experience than his opponent.

Obama IS the common man. He came from nothing and worked his way up to become a US Senator. He didn't have a silver spoon like Bush did. And he wasn't too old like McCain (who was also too old in 2000, when he SHOULD have been elected).

Palin is a journalism major (and beauty queen as has been noted) who went on to become a mayor of a small town and governor of a state with more bears than people. She's a quitter. The going got tough, and so she quit. Yes, that's exactly who I want in charge of the US in wartime and when the economy is in the shitter.

Anonymous said...

Phil in Cow town,"The only thing McCain had was that he had more experience than Obama, then he threw away that advantage by choosing the only person in the country with less experience than his opponent.".
I don't think so, that person is in the white house. Palin had been a governor for a few years and has had experience managing a government. Obama is a "community organizer". The earlier poster is right, McCain refused to take on Obama and attack his weakness as having zero experience and now we all are watching a government that doesn't have a clue.

Phil In Cow Town said...

They both have little to no experience on the national level. Palin didn't even have a full term as Governor under her belt. She had two years at the time of the election. Same as Obama.

You can't burn Obama for it while praising Palin for it.

Bobby said...

Phil, what's common about Obama? He comes from a broken home, an interracial home, his name was Barrack yet he insisted people call him "Barry" in college and then goes back to Barrack. He has associated with leftists all his life, he got a law degree yet became a "community organizer," he only spent 2 years in the senate before running for president. This man is not common, he's exceptional and I don't mean that as a compliment.

Palin did not cost him the election, McCain was simply to polite and more likely to attack his friends than to attack Obama.

Palin on the other hand is real, she has a college education but doesn't act like the Ivy League elite, she's able to be a mother and hold a job, she can hunt, fish, and drive a snowmobile. She speaks clearly instead of delivering speeches based on hopes and dreams.

How can you not love a woman who yells "drill, baby, drill" while Obama would rather save arctic wasteland in a state where oil exploration is supported by the majority of its residents?

Maybe Bush had a silver spoon, but at least he was in the National Guard and anyone who has survived basic training will tell you that is no picnic. The fact that he flew F16's should tell you that the man not only had the brains required but lots of talent since most soldiers don't get that privilege. Just like in the Air Force, most people there don't get to be pilots, they do other stuff like support, mechanics, radar, etc.


"who went on to become a mayor of a small town and governor of a state with more bears than people."

---That is really insulting, I don't know why some people insist on putting down the great state of Alaska. Do you have any idea how high our gasoline prices would be if Alaska became an independent nation and refused to sell their oil to us? There are plenty of states with low populations such as Delaware and Rhode Island, yet unlike Alaska, those states are tiny and easy to manage unlike certain Alaskan towns that can only be reached by boat, plane or snowmobiles.

And yes, I would rather have Palin fighting our war against terrorism unlike Obama who refuses to call it that. Palin would never nominate and attorney general more interested in persecuting the CIA for "crimes" against terrorists, Palin would never support stimulus packages, bailouts, cash for clunkers or the obamacare fiasco, and if someone brought a gun to a townhall, Palin would probably smile and celebrate the second amendment instead of using her cronies to call that person a traitor.

I don't mind her quitting, sometimes you have to know when to quit. Honorable people quit when they can't do the job, and thanks to the persecution of the media and the junk lawsuits filled against her by democrats which where costing her family more than $500,000 to defend, she had no choice but to quit.

Unlike Obama, Palin is a patriot, plain and simple, that's something liberals will never understand because they hate this country and want us to be like Europe.

Robert said...

Obama IS the common man.

Hmm, is the common man steeped in the KGB's Anti-American propaganda from birth? Does the common man really want the system of government designed to protect his liberties torn down and replaced with a fascist police state? Does the common man really want himself and his posterity spent into a lifetime of debt slavery? Does the common man really want the government establishing a power over his subsistence, which as Alexander Hamilton noted in Federalist #79, is a power over his will? Does the common man really want those who are supposed to represent him cozying up to, admiring, and emulating each of the five vilest, cruelest tyrants in the world? Or was the electorate simply in the mood for a change away from ex-President Bush and his party last November, no matter how bad the main alternative was? My money's on the last one.

Phil In Cow Town said...

"Palin on the other hand is real, she has a college education but doesn't act like the Ivy League elite, she's able to be a mother and hold a job, she can hunt, fish, and drive a snowmobile. She speaks clearly instead of delivering speeches based on hopes and dreams."

Ok, that last part is complete crap. You need to go back and actually watch one of her speeches. She rambles on and on switching topics before she's done them.

You can't honestly believe that ADHD makes one a good public speaker!

And yes Palin isn't Ivy league. None of the 6 colleges she went to for her 4 year degree were.

"I don't know why some people insist on putting down the great state of Alaska"

Stating facts is insulting now?

"Palin would probably smile and celebrate the second amendment instead of using her cronies to call that person a traitor."

Oh yeah, let's let people with guns near the president, that's never gone badly before has it? Bush didn't even allow people wearing T-SHIRTS he disagreed with in his meetings.

"Honorable people quit when they can't do the job"

First thing about Palin I've agreed with you on. She couldn't do the job. So why would she be a good choice to do an even more high stress job with even more people being affected by her decisions? If she thinks the media are "rough" on her as Governor of Alaska, imagine how they'll be if she was President!

Conservative's NEED Liberals. Without Liberals to bash (and this obviously goes both ways) you end up with a massively unbalanced country, and usually a shitty one. Look what happened when the Taliban (all conservatives) took over Afghanistan, or when the commies (obviously liberals) took over China. Massively shitty countries.

Anonymous said...

PHIL

I did listen to some of Palin's talks through MSM, and then saw the whole thing on the internet. BIG difference. The MSM wanted her to look stupid and edited her talks, and interviews, to portray her that way. Her speeches that I saw were also not provided through a teleprompter.

The fact that you are comparing her experience to Obama's instead of McCains shows how the left works... if you can't fight a fair fight, fight an unfair one. Who cares about the vice president?

So, in order to be president, from your logic, you must be from a big city, be able to read a teleprompter really well, and have ACORN to get illegal votes for you in swing states (like Nevada where Californians voted-i.e. 50 people registered to the same address, multiple votes by students in Michigan, etc.)

I do agree, we need both Conservatives, and Liberals, and more Moderates, and we should always have the opposite party in the WH than in Congress.

Phil In Cow Town said...

I agreed that Obama had little experience, but if something were to happen to McCain, Palin would be in charge. That's why her experience is important too. McCain is old, that was pointed out by Republican's in 2000, he's obviously now even older than that! His choice of VP was important as there was a chance she'd see action.

And Fox news edited her speeches to make her look stupid? I find that hard to believe. I also find it hard to believe that they did it WHILE SHE WAS TALKING AND BEING BROADCAST LIVE!

Frankly, she should use a teleprompter. Everyone uses them, they're great. Everyone since Nixon has used these things.

Where did I say what my requirements for being president are? Way to argue a point I never even made. Good job.

Oh, and I'm not far left. I'm not even near left. I'm just one of the hundreds of millions of people on this planet who can see that Palin is an extremely bad choice.

Bobby said...

Hey Phil,

"Ok, that last part is complete crap. You need to go back and actually watch one of her speeches. She rambles on and on switching topics before she's done them."

---I saw her speech at the republican convention, it was great. She didn't even look like she was using a teleprompter.


"And yes Palin isn't Ivy league. None of the 6 colleges she went to for her 4 year degree were."

--What are you talking about? She only went to one college.

"Stating facts is insulting now?"

--Alaska is a great state, it's a free state with a libertarian streak. They have no sale taxes, no income taxes, no debt, great outdoor activities, and a wonderful lifestyle. Your comment reminded me of those people who refer to states between California and New York as "flyover states."


"Oh yeah, let's let people with guns near the president, that's never gone badly before has it? Bush didn't even allow people wearing T-SHIRTS he disagreed with in his meetings."

---This is America, in this country the President is not our superior, he does not have more rights than us. Our CONSTITUTION gives us the right to keep and bear arms and it does not provide for special exception when the president is near. Just because a few presidents have been shot doesn't mean we have to give up our second amendment.

"Conservative's NEED Liberals. Without Liberals to bash (and this obviously goes both ways) you end up with a massively unbalanced country, and usually a shitty one. "

---No, conservatives need LIBERTARIANS because only libertarians support freedom and help them balance out their desires to legislate morality. Liberals hate freedom.


"Look what happened when the Taliban (all conservatives) took over Afghanistan, or when the commies (obviously liberals) took over China. Massively shitty countries."

---Those weren't conservatives, those where religious fanatics.

Anyway, I think you should read this book:
http://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Fascism-American-Mussolini-Politics/dp/0385511841

Phil In Cow Town said...

Of COURSE the Taliban are conservatives!

-Small Government - tribal leaders
-Tax breaks for Business owners - Poppy growers
-Against gay marriage
-Think women should dress conservatively
-Against abortion
-For capital punishment
-Use of force when necessary
-Think everyone should do as they say as they know what's best

How are those NOT conservative beliefs? They're certainly not liberal values!

You're problem is that you're thinking of the political spectrum as a line when it's actually a square. Libertarians are perpendicular to conservativism, not opposite.

Bobby said...

Of COURSE the Taliban are conservatives!

-Small Government - tribal leaders

---Yet they share everything, see? They're leftwingers.

-Tax breaks for Business owners - Poppy growers

---Afghanistan is a big country, even the Taliban can't supervise every area and by the way, they often destroy the poppy fields which aren't grown by religious fanatics but by poor people trying to make a living. It's the same reason poor farmers in Bolivia are happier growing coca leafs which are worth more than bananas.

-Against gay marriage

---Every communist country is also against gay marriage. Putin himself is no friend of gays.


-Think women should dress conservatively

---No, they want to hide women and have them covered from head to to. Even the Iranians don't go that far.

-Against abortion

---Yet pro-child brides.

-For capital punishment

---There are communist and righwing regimes with the same views.

-Use of force when necessary

---Conservatives don't advocate vigilatism.

-Think everyone should do as they say as they know what's best

---Conservatives let you choose. Protesting against your choices isn't the same as stopping you from having a choice.

Libertarians are perpendicular to conservatism, not opposite.

---No, libertarians are social liberals that believe in freedom. They'll let you have an abortion but they don't want the state paying for it, they hate affirmative action but don't support preferential race treatment either. Christian conservatives want to build a nation without immorality, which is why they'll fight against the strip bar in the seedy part of town for example. Libertarians tolerate immorality and at the same time support freedom for those who want to live in their own communities away from the values they find hateful. It's like the state of Nevada, in that wonderful state property taxes don't exist, gun laws are friendly, and you can hire a hooker in two tiny counties outside metropolitan areas.

Robert said...

That list leaves out the most important criterion for a conservative, as the term is understood today - the desire for individual liberty and a government with its powers severely limited. On the most important criterion, the last thing the Taliban could be considered is conservative (as the term is understood today; they could be considered "conservative" only by the original connotation of the word in the 18th and 19th centuries, before American intellectuals got bent to the service of the statists and helped invert the connotations of "liberal" and "conservative").

Anonymous said...

Bill Clinton said obama is a common chicago thug. Odamna is a useless waste of flesh. He has proved himself completely inept at being president.. He is a making a good fascist..

Use the Name, Luke said...

"Yeah, it's amazing how fast they go from "you have to support the president" to "it's ass kicking time!" when their guy doesn't get elected."

I apologize for being somewhat sloppy. There is treason against the government, and there is treason against the Constitution. When the government is committing treason against the Constitution, it is not treason to defend the Constitution.

My apologies for the confusion.

BTW, that's the key point that you liberals are missing here too. It's not about our guy vs. their guy, as you have claimed. Otherwise, the shooting would have started a long time ago.

The real issue is any guy vs. The Constitution. If you had actually paid attention when conservatives tried to tell you that we were unhappy with Bush's own violations, maybe you would actually understand that.

Of course, your continued insistence on ignoring facts you don't like has once again been demonstrated in this thread. Par for the course.