Thursday, November 18, 2010

"Don’t Tread On Me" License Plate Coming to Virginia?



We read:
"In Virginia, Delegate John O’Bannon is sponsoring legislation that could bring a “Don’t Tread On Me” license plate to the roads in the Old Dominion. This seems like a pretty cool idea.

There is some irony in the license plate though. As Bearing Drift’s Brian Kirwin noted, “I don’t mind if the Tea Party gets their own license plates. I just never saw so many Tea Partiers so excited to write government a check before.”

Source

Interesting to see what opposition this encounters. "Too political", probably

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Tea Partiers don't mind writing a check to the government, so long as we get something for our money, which is "highly" unusual.

I wonder if the insatiably greedy, elected lying crooks who run The Peoples Republic of NY smell a buck here and do the same thing.

Anonymous said...

AP; 11-17-10:

Thirty-one-year-old John Tyner, a 31-year-old recently unleashed the “Don’t tase me, Bro” moment of airport security. While about to receive a genital check from TSA security, Tyner agreed to a search of non-intimate areas but said, “If you touch my junk, I’ll have you arrested.” However, Muslim women will not have to face such worries. CNSNews.com has reported that Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) — which is frequently tied to domestic terror plots — has been guaranteed that TSA officials will only pat down Muslim women in the head and neck area.

CAIR said Muslims who object to full-body scans for religious reasons should know their rights if they are required to undergo a pat-down, including asking for the procedure to be done in a private place. In addition, CAIR offered a “special recommendation” for Muslim women who wear a hijab, telling them they should tell the TSA officer that they may be searched only around the head and neck.

“Before you are patted down, you should remind the TSA officer that they are only supposed to pat down the area in question, in this scenario, your head and neck. They SHOULD NOT subject you to a full-body or partial-body pat-down.”

Muslim women will likely opt for the not-very-invasive security pat-down, because most consider airports’ high-image body scans a violation of Islamic Shari’a law. CNS News adds, “In February, the Figh Council of North America, a group of Islamic scholars, issued a fatwa, or religious ruling, that full-body scanners violate Islamic law.”

So, Muslim women will not be subject to a full body scan or a pat-down on much of their elaborately concealed bodies. Feeling secure yet?

Add this to the growing proof that political correctness is not merely totalitarian but suicidal. The president made an exception to airline security protocol big enough to drive a jihad through — and applied it only to the adherents of Islam. Roman Catholic nuns can be groped en masse, but Obama rushed to defend the dignity of Muslim women.

Luckily, Muslim terrorists have no history of using female suicide bombers or hiding explosives in their underwear.

Consider this just another reason why one-in-four Americans believe Obama is a Muslim.

Anonymous said...

In many wars and conflicts women have been used to traffic weapons etc. under their substantial clothing, relying on taboos about touching, inspecting or unclothing the female body; not least under the conveniently hooped skirts worn at the time of the US Civil War.

Spurwing Plover said...

Should be better then the ones here in CALIFORNIA show whales tails from the eco-wackos

Anonymous said...

There are many documented cases of female Muslim suicide bombers. Just cause for subjecting them to the fullest searches.

Until you profile correctly you will never reduce the threat of terror in the air. Israel got it right. I know since I have been through Ben Gurion twice. It is harder to get out of the country than to get into it.

If the price of security is that Muslims don't fly because of their religious beliefs in regards to body scans and searches then so be it.

Air travel is not a right, walking is.

Anonymous said...

Well said: Anon 4:32 PM.

It's push a little every time the Mooslimes can. The old adage 3-steps forward, 2-back may be slow but what the heck. Time doesn't seem to matter to these people unless it's on an I.E.D. timer.

Next thing you know those CAIR people will be demanding that Muslim Women have their own section in Yaknee Stadium!

Anonymous said...

Muslims are virtually asking/demanding for something akin to apartheid - a whole set of separate amenities and laws for the muslim population, while the host population which provides for it can just go and do what they can with what's left of their own country and culture (it's much like cuckoos in the nest!).