Monday, January 28, 2013

US court: Sex offender Facebook ban unconstitutional

"An Indiana law barring most registered sex offenders from using social networking sites such as Facebook is unconstitutional, a federal appeals court ruled Wednesday.

The law that bans sex offenders from using sites they know allow access to youths under the age of 18 is too broad, a three-judge panel determined, and 'prohibits substantial protected speech.'"

To be upheld, the appeals court found, such a law needs to be more specifically tailored to target "the evil of improper communication to minors."

The ruling from the 7th U.S. Circuit of Appeals in Chicago overturned a June decision by a district court judge in Indianapolis that upheld the law enacted by the legislature in 2008.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana filed a class-action suit challenging the law on behalf of sex offenders, including a man identified only as John Doe who served three years for child exploitation. The offenders were all restricted by the ban even though they had served their sentences and are no longer on probation.


There have always been some non-protected forms of speech  -- such as libel -- so this could have gone either way.


Anonymous said...

"Freedom, like pure clean water, is essential to our way of life. Lest we forget what too much water can do..."

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

Too much freedom will/does have the same effect as too much of anything. That being, negative.