Monday, December 31, 2012
Ohio man’s lawyer argues Facebook post was free speech
The 20-year-old Columbia Station man accused of using social media to cheer on the gunman who killed 20 children and six adults at the Newtown, Conn., elementary school is asking that a criminal charge filed against him be dismissed, citing free-speech protections.
Medina police charged Joseph W. Resovsky with inducing panic after he posted “im so happy someone shot up all those little (expletives). VIVA LA SCHOOL SHOOTINGS!!!!” on Dec. 14, the day of the killings.
Resovsky filed a motion Wednesday in Medina Municipal Court asking Judge Dale Chase to dismiss the charge, a first-degree misdemeanor punishable by up to 180 days in jail and a $1,000 fine.
“This charge clearly abridges the Defendant’s freedom of speech and quite possibly freedom of the press as this post was published on Facebook,” Resovsky, who is representing himself in the case, wrote in the motion.
Resovsky argued that his Facebook post did not cause a panic, and therefore, did not violate Ohio law.
“This action, while in bad taste, in no way constitutes an offense,” he wrote.
“The Defendant is permitted to express his feelings publicly. This right is guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Ohio Constitution.”
Source
This may have been a deliberate provocation. He would seem to be within his rights anyway.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
This guy certainly seems like the kind of person his friends, family, and eventual victims wish had gotten proper mental health care before he wandered into that school with a gun...
Objectionable speech should be protected; otherwise it is not free speech. Protection of speech that everyone agrees with is redundant.
This story is yet another example proving the below-listed quote.
"Freedom, like pure clean water, is essential to our way of life. Lest we forget what too much water can do..."
How about a post labeling CHE is a cold blooded killer which will shock all those running around wearing their CHE T-Shirts
You are absolutely right Anon 3:04
Popular speech needs no protection.
I could absolutely see this type of slogan on a Westboro Baptist Church placard and it would be just as protected there as on Facebook by this bozo.
Post a Comment