Wednesday, February 25, 2015



LAPD Targets Citizens’ Free Speech Rights

Charlie Beck, chief of the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD), wrote a letter recently to Larry Page, CEO of Google, to complain about the Waze app’s ability to track the location of police officers.

Waze is a wildly popular mobile app, owned by Google, that lets users type in their destination address, and, while driving with the app open on their phone, passively contribute real-time traffic data. Users can also actively report accidents, traffic jams, police locations, or any road hazard by tapping buttons, giving other users in the area a heads-up.

It’s the police-location feature that Beck opposes.

“It is not always in the public’s best interest to know where police are operating,” Beck said, explaining the letter. “There is a criminal element that are able to ply their trade and ply their craft more effectively by knowing where police are.”

Beck concluded his letter by asking for a “dialogue” with Page on how “Google can prevent the future misuse of the Waze app to track law enforcement officers . . .” It is not a stretch to surmise that Beck wants the police button removed from the app.

Let’s be clear about what Beck is asking: He wants this app, and presumably any similar traffic app in the future, to not allow private citizens to communicate with each other about the public whereabouts of police.

If mandated by governments in the future, such a ban would be a clear infringement of citizens’ free speech rights, and a dark and dangerous road to go down.

SOURCE

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Beck has a point that criminals would like to know where police are. There is a question of freedom of speech versus public good.

Stan B said...

Anon 12:56 AM wrote: "There is a question of freedom of speech versus public good."

And the answer is: Freedom of Speech.

http://www.aclu-mo.org/legal-docket/elli-v-ellisville/

stinky said...

There is a question of freedom of speech versus public good.

That question has already been comprehensively addressed in the Bill Of Rights. If you wish to revisit the issue, pass an amendment. Till then, asked and answered.

Anonymous said...

That question has already been comprehensively addressed in the Bill Of Rights. If you wish to revisit the issue, pass an amendment. Till then, asked and answered.

Not so, a person cannot falsely yell "Fire" in a crowded theater.

Bird of Paradise said...

Just like that liberal leftists New York paper that published the adresses of gun owners and the author of the article wants armed protestion

Anonymous said...

@802 "Not so, a person cannot falsely yell "Fire" in a crowded theater."

The key word there is falsely. Truth is a defense against charges of fraud, slander, or libel.

Uno Hu said...

Put simply and in the fewest words:

If Waze deletes the police button -

I delete Waze.