Tuesday, February 19, 2013



National Socialism: the clue’s in the name


A National Socialist badge.  The German word for "Socialist" is clearly evident.  Because of the similarities between German and English, the German words for both "national" and "socialist" are readily understood by English speakers.  DAP stands for "Deutsche Arbeiter Partei", or "German Workers' Party"

How can [British] Conservatives ensure they always lose? A good place to start is to concede every lie of the left.

The Conservative Party appears to be doing what it can in this regard. Take their decision to strike Rachel Frosh from their candidates list for the great crime of… linking Nazism to socialism.

Frosh committed her thought crime on Twitter. Thanks to a left-wing stink being kicked up on the same medium, her career – including twenty years in the NHS – is now apparently nullified overnight. She has had to step down from her role as a Police and Crime Commissioner and now she cannot stand for the Conservatives at an election. A party spokesman has said: ‘these comments are completely unacceptable and it is right that she has stepped down’.

Clearly the Conservative party has taken the view that they do not want anyone involved in politics or policing who takes a view on history that is actually correct.

It is neither an insult to all of the left, nor an attempt to exonerate all of the right, but rather a statement of historical fact that National Socialism had its origins in socialism. If the Conservative party’s apparatchiks look hard enough they will even find a clue in the name. But evidently they are too busy giving in to left-wing twitter-mobs to have time for such a bland and useless thing as historical truth.

Source

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

The usless twits in the conservative party can't counter leftist propaganda. How do they expect to counter Islam?
I think it is time that the UK dumped PC and created their own version of the Tea Party to try and restore some sanity in politics.

A. Levy said...

Showing weakness at every turn will not defeat the Left. In fact, the Right's weakness, their desire to always "play by the rules", while the Left plays by no rules, is what fuels the Left.

One of the oldest and most effective tactics of the Left is to always keep their enemies on the defensive using lies, rumor, innuendo, misinformation, etc. This tactic forces the weaklings of the Right to spend all their time apologizing for everything they say and do, and even for things they (didn't) say or do.

The Left understands that in the "court of public opinion", a person defending themselves, even from obvious lies, always looks weak and guilty. In the minds of the mindless masses, they think that if someone has to defend themselves, they must be guilty. You would think that by now, those on the Right would have caught onto this trick, but apparently not. That's why the Left always wins.

Anonymous said...

It's just silly to play with vague terms like "socialism" that can mean whatever you want it to mean - Nazism, Communism, liberal democracy, etc., etc. Did Nazi Germany and today's Swedish socialism look identical in style because they could be described as "socialist"? (Please no silly troll responses!)

Use the Name, Luke said...

"Socialism" is more of an umbrella term, much like "aircraft" is. Though it does describe something, there are significant variations within that broader definition.

For example, jet fighter, passenger jet, single-engine propeller plane, helicopter, auto-gyro, ultra-light, and hang glider are all sub-categories that fall within the larger category of "aircraft".

Likewise, communism, marxism, fascism (both the German and Italian versions), and other variations all fall under the broader term of "socialism".

Use the Name, Luke said...

Since when has the left let a little lying get in their way?

stinky said...


It's just silly to play with vague terms like "socialism" that can mean whatever you want it to mean - Nazism, Communism, liberal democracy, etc., etc. Did Nazi Germany and today's Swedish socialism look identical in style because they could be described as "socialist"?

A turd is still recognizably a turd.