More Leftist hate speech
We read:
"Speaking at a rally today, Pennsylvania State Representative Babette Josephs suggested that pro-life women are not in fact women, but 'men with breasts'. Apparently women cannot be truly women unless they support unfettered abortion.
This is sad on so many levels. To start, how is it that showing a woman an ultrasound prior to her having an abortion taking away her 'choice'? It provides her with more information, allowing her to make an informed choice. What is so scary about that? What is it that the folks who so vehemently call themselves pro-choice don't want her to see? Pro-life advocates are often smeared as withholding information or distorting facts in order to impose their morality on women. But what could be a better source of indisputable facts than showing a woman what is happening inside her own body?
There apparently isn't room for questions like these at Democratic rallies.
Source
21 comments:
Another liberal infernal scribbler writting their crap in thw pages of the usial birdcage linners/parrots toilets
And of course, you will hear no apology from this leftist cretin, just as you will never hear an apology from Bill Maher or anyone else on the left. Obviously, Rush Limbaugh needs to take a lesson from them.
Women in such a vulnerable situation should not be intimidated by people with personal agendas.
The Republican War on Women marches forward.
Democrates are "inclusive" only in the sence that they will welcome people of all races, creeds and sexes - as long as they all think exactly alike. Inclusivity of thought or ideas is not allowd.
@Anon 2:36, It's definitely a war--a war against the selfishness and self-centeredness of those who disregard the fragile lives of the unborn.
For a woman to get pregnant, she must have sex, and it is either have consensual sex, or non-consensual sex. It's not rocket science. If it was consensual sex, then pregnancy is an absolute possible consequence, and she must live with that consequence. If it was non-consensual sex, then it is her duty to report it to the authorities so that the perp can be properly tried and convicted.
3:26 lives in a over-simplistic either-or world. Sounds like a pontificating man - not unlike muslem men
Anon 4:15, obviously life is more complex than simple either-or, but the fact remains that a woman gets pregnant because she has sex. It is as simple as that. And that is undeniable and irrefutable. Keeping one's pants zipped or legs closed would prevent more problems than most would care to admit. But people want total freedom without the responsibilities that accompany it.
Stop feeding the troll already, you guys. Let him get back to his ... his ... well, not much of a life, I know, but ... he's gotta go get a real one on his own sometime and he sure can't do that when he's beggin' for crumbs here, now can he?
The demacrats are always calling themselves the party of the poor and needy WHAT A LOAD OF DONKEY DUNG the liberal demacrats are the party of BIG GOVERMENT and MORE REGULATIONS and LITIGATION since the demacRATS are supported by all the trial lawyers and Big Labor as well
Well said Sig.
Ah, how nice to see the level of public civility raised in political discourse by our politicians.
Demonise those you disagree with - grubby tactics.
@Anon 4:15, Not pontificating, just relaying words of wisdom that far too many simply do not want to hear or face.
And the difference between me and a Muslim man is that, as Christians, my wife and I treat each other with mutual respect, honor, and love in a marriage grounded in the loving framework of God's design, not the hate-filled orders of the man, Muhammad.
When a society reaches the point where it condones the killing of its children, born or unborn, it is destined to fall.
"It's definitely a war--a war against the selfishness and self-centeredness of those who disregard the fragile lives of the unborn."
So, a woman is nothing more than an incubator, eh?
WHAT IS SO SCARY? If you see the baby inside you can't continue to deny the fact that a human being has been created. It is much more difficult to then terminate the unborn. But you know what they say, "Ignorance is Bliss".
@Anon 4:12 said, "So, a woman is nothing more than an incubator, eh?"
As a Conservative Christian, I can only say that I have absolutely no idea how you ever came to that conclusion from the above comments.
But then the Liberal pro-abortionist would have no choice to answer you with a resounding "Yes!"
Consider that Liberal pro-abortionists assert that...
-an unborn child is merely an organized clump of cells no different from an organ or a tumor subject to similar removal
-only scientific terminology is used when referring to procedures on an unborn child such as terminating a pregnancy, fetal reduction, etc.
-pregnancy is an unfortunate side effect of an intimate night that should be "taken care of"
-the rights of the unborn baby exist solely with the mother, not the unborn baby itself
So in which camp do you pitch your tent?
(Oh, and I'm sorry that my wife and I respect, love, and care about each other enough to actually make our marriage successful and enjoyable. Any other view of marriage is really pathetic.)
Sig u r a prig
Liberals are a example of ones brains on drugs
@anon 2:37, yep, that may be true, but I have a very fulfilled life, a happy family, and a solid marriage to my best friend, and I thank God every day for it.
"I have a very fulfilled life, a happy family,..."
I'm glad someone here is happy.
How can people be happy (self satisfied) when knowing other people are miserable? That was once called the "I'm alright Jack" selfish view of living!
Oh yeah, let me guess - Now Sig is going to say he gives a few token dollars or a few hours of his "happy" time to his church for charitable purposes!
Post a Comment