The truth is liable to prosecution in Sweden
We read:
"Several newspapers reported that Skånepartiets party chairman Carl P Herslow is being charged with ”incitement to racial hatred” after he was on the town square in Malmö with a picture of Muhammad and 6-year-old Aisha.
The image stems from the generally accepted fact in Islam that Muhammad married a 6-year-old girl and raped her at 9-years old. The image is therefore something that is described in the Islamic texts about Muhammad – the Muslims' primary role model. How this ”prophet” lived is something that Muslims strive to live by, as he is ”the perfect man” according to their beliefs.
That Mohammed sexually assaulted young children is therefore no secret (read the hadith on jihad in Malmö). Yet JK chooses to prosecute him for incitement to racial hatred (”hets mot folkgrupp”).
Put that in relation to what went down in the mosque at "Medborgarplatsen” in Stockholm. The mosque sold anti-Semitic tapes in 2005 – Jews were compared to monkeys, pigs and diseases, and that the ”Final Solution” for Jews was a ”jihad” – holy war.
”O Allah, annihilate the Jews, O Allah, annihilate the Jews! O Allah curse them and expulsions them and let them whipped with suffering. O Allah, of heaven and earth! ”
Then Justice Chancellor at the time, Göran Lambertz, began a preliminary investigation on the incitement of hatred, but decided to close the case on the grounds that the ties were ”very critical of the Jews” but otherwise there was no violation of Swedish law.
So, in Sweden today, you can prosecute a man for telling an established truth that is openly described in Islamic texts, but to prosecute Muslims call for the murder of Jews is not hate speech according to the Chancellor.
Source
5 comments:
Maybe the Chancellor dropped the investigation because he found out that the mosque was actually owned by a jew and didn't want to interfere with his rent collection?
As the rational people of the world know, the only real solution to terrorism is the "complete" annihilation and eradication of the cult known as Islam and all who follow the teachings of it's phony, pedophile "prophet". It comes down to the simple question, do we do it to them, or wait until they do it to us? So far, we're losing.
I think the cartoon of Mohammad and Aisha is wrong. They drew his penis clearly too large. His pedo ways and megalomania are sure indicators of overcompensation for a tiny weiner.
"Maybe the Chancellor dropped the investigation because he found out that the mosque was actually owned by a jew and didn't want to interfere with his rent collection?"
---That's ridiculous, why would a Jew own a mosque? How the hell do you make money with that?
Great article and picture, although I do agree with Anon 6:52 about the overly prominent Prophet private parts.
Obviously the focus on his private parts is to focus on his interest in (child)sex as much as, or more than, his "religion"!
Post a Comment