Swiss leftists want to silence magazine-editor
We read:
"The editor-in-chief of the Swiss magazine Weltwoche, Roger Köppel, has been indicted by Socialists in Zurich. The reason: he violated an anti-racism law. On talk shows, according to the Socialist thought-gestapo, Köppel "systematically denigrated and vilified members of the Islamic religion and thus crossed the borders of racism.” The guardians of political correctness subsequently filed a criminal complaint with the Public Prosecutor in Zurich.
The Jungsozialisten proudly announce: "Roger Köppel, editor and editor-in-chief of the Weltwoche, with numerous statements in the comments in the editions 43 and 47 of Weltwochehas made it clear that the people of the Islamic faith who live in Switzerland are a fundamental threat to security and order of the country due to their religion, from his perspective, and that one therefore would not need to be tolerant towards them. He ascribes to the Muslim women and Muslims in general an "unfulfilled nostalgia for the political coup”, because they "right up to today have not got over the loss of their empire.” The present Islam wants to be "a political domination system”, even a "political-religious ideology of conquest”, that is "hostile towards the current order” and seeks "extension, subversion and conquest.
In the above-mentioned television broadcast "Tele Züri” he made similar statements, and included the matching opinion that Muslim women and Muslim men living in Switzerland should be considered members of "a hostile army”.
Source
Sounds to me like a pretty good summary of how many Islamists talk. Hopefully truth is a defense in Switzerland.
8 comments:
Truth is not a defense when dealing with special classes of "victims". In fact, in many of these socialist countries, truth can be a crime. Obviously, the Swiss insist on learning things the hard way. I say, great! There is nothing that will turn a socialist into a conservative faster than being beheaded. I await the pleasure of seeing Swiss heads roll.
How is it possible that vilifying a religion violates some racism law? Even if everything said about the religion is false, it is not racism.
Well said, he made a factual statement about a religion.
That religion is not in itself racist in that it doesn't limit itself to members of a certain race, therefore that statement can't possibly be racist.
I suggest reading this:
http://obamaisnotmypresident.com/blog/?page_id=1683
It a bit of an eye opener and explains the conflicting view on Islam.
Will the complainers please explain to me what race he was vilifiying. Describing adherrents to a religion that advocates violence as dangerous is stating the obvious.
the "race card" is not only over-used but mis-used.
Where can I buy a deck of cards that include a "race card"?
islam is not a religion.. it is more of a death cult.. look up the worship of kali in India.
Post a Comment