We read:
"Although Arif Uka shouted "Allahu Akbar" before opening fire on U.S. Military members in Germany this week, killing two Airmen and severely wounding two others, the State Department is refusing to call the planned attack an act of terrorism.
State Department Spokesman PJ Crowley implied we shouldn't rush to judgement in this case, that we should "look at the evidence and look at the motivation and then you make a judgment.”
Source
I'm speechless
15 comments:
"look at the evidence and look at the motivation and then you make a judgment.”
Sounds like due diligence to me.
They didn't want to say the Ft Hood guy was a terrorist, either. Until all the evidence said otherwise. Our government really, really, really sucks at this time.
"Until all the evidence said otherwise. Our government really, really, really sucks at this time."
I guess evidence is irrelevant to conservatives.
Anon 2:21
And OJ was innocent...
Evidence like 'the Cambridge police acted stupidly' Yeah I understand his due diligence - Jump to conclusions with friends when there is no indication, jump away from conclusions when it is pretty obvious, but Muslim.
evidence, like how Sarah Palin's map caused the gunman to shoot Giffords. Interesting how they decide when to wait for evidence and when to jump right in and blame conservatives immediately, before ANY facts are known.
Love the double-standard
"Let's not rush to judgment."
Of course not. There was no rush to judgment immediately following the Tucson shootings, now was there?
Oh, wait. There was.
Never mind.
...and of course the Times Square bomber. It just had to be a Tea Partier. Oh wait, wrong again!!
Oh yeah, well.... it's something a Tea Partier probably would have done, maybe. So that makes it at least partially true - except for the facts.
Yeah, for Nidal Malik Hasan it was that he was suffering from post or pre traumatic stress syndrome from having to listen to war stories from soldiers. Being he yelled Allah Akbar had no bearing on his murder of US Servicemen and women. The guy who rolled grenades into officer tents in Iraq, they tried to explain it away at first as a personal disagreement until the traitor admitted it was because of religion. It is not Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus or even atheists and pagans who are turning their weapons on their countrymen. It is members of the “Religion of Peace.” Don’t trust Muslims, they will backstab you every time, sometimes quite literally.
Well look who is our SECRATARY of STATE our former PREDIDENT married to co-president bill
tate Department Spokesman PJ Crowley implied we shouldn't rush to judgement in this case, that we should "look at the evidence and look at the motivation and then you make a judgment."
Ok, here's the evidence and the motivations:
1. The perpetrators shouted "Allahu Akbar" before opening fire. The motivation behind this is that by shouting "Allahu Akbar" before killing, it is crystal clear that it is being done in accordance with the teachings of Islam, which by its own pronouncement, intends to spread itself across the globe, and eliminate those who do not believe in Islam.
2. The perpetrators opened fire on U.S. Military personnel. The motivation clear that the intent was to harm the soldiers of a country--clearly a political and militaristic move.
The conclusion can only be that it was a direct attack on the United States military--an act of war--in the name of a religious organization that is steeped in religious fanaticism.
The State Department needs to get off its butt and stop pandering to the President's pro-Islamic stance.
[sarcasm]
Oh come on - every time somebody yells out "Allah Akbar" before some mad-made disaster occurs, everyone wants to cry Islamic Terrorism! Where's the balance? Maybe the guy was praying for God to keep the bullets from hurting anyone as he fired off round after round at his targets! Maybe he was just cleaning the gun and it went off! Why oh why do my fellow Americans automatically jump to the racist conclusion that he was acting as an instrument of Jihad???
[/sarcasm]
"Just watch how many fools seek to re-elect him (Obama)."
What are YOU going to do about it? Just whine about it on message boards?
Only if McCann selected someone else for VP in '08, things would have been a lot different today.
Given the official US policy of bowing to muhammedans in everything, are we still surprised by this?
With a muhammedan president, is anything else to be expected?
Post a Comment