Cautiously, of course. The words of that mini-Chomsky and great hater, Brian Leiter follow:
"Meanwhile, the Republican criminals in Wisconsin forced through their attack on workers' rights, leading to an uproar in Madison. At some point these acts of brazen viciousness are going to lead to a renewed philosophical interest in the question of when acts of political violence are morally justified"
Source
Calling lawmakers who are fulfilling their election promises "criminals" is typical Leiter/Chomsky. It is basically senseless and mere hate-speech -- as is the accusation of "brazen viciousness"
Leiter does not of course advocate violence explicitly but what he says is a threat nonetheless and is apprently intended as such. It is perfectly obvious that a redefinition of what counts as acceptable violence could lead to a greater social and legal acceptance of violence -- as long as the violence comes from the Left of course
6 comments:
"Calling lawmakers who are fulfilling their election promises "criminals""
Boo hoo hoo.
Typical rotten to the core lawyers like them who want to be allowed to sue every buisness and these sharks and vultures and in league with the donkeys as partners in crime
He's right about the violence, but that's all. In the end, it will come down to violence in order to save our country from the Marxists, Communists, and anarchists of the Left. It's been coming for a very long time, and so far, all the violence has been coming from the Left. It's time we fought back and showed them what real violence is all about. It's looooong overdue!
Claire Wolfe once famously said, "America is at that awkward stage....it's too late to work within the system, and it's too early to start shooting the bastards." Is it really too early?
"To solve the worlds problems, you must first start by killing all the lawyers..." Shakespeare
Q. What do you call a bunch of lawyers on the TITANIC? A. A good start
Post a Comment