Friday, April 26, 2013



Fair's fair




21 comments:

Anonymous said...

Interesting to see the picture from Vietnam with Bush's head superimposed or the one with the noose. Any thing remotely like this about Obama is sure to get a visit from the Secret Service and days on end of comment from the media.

Bird of Paradise said...

Did these miserble little wanks ever repect RONALD REAGAN? certianly not look at how he was treated by the hollyweed crowd and usial liberal stand up comedians and such they these same little snots demand we show respect for OBAMA?! TELL THEM TO GO POUND SAND

Anonymous said...

Should anyone be surprised to find that those on the Left, the ones who demand total tolerance from everyone, have zero tolerance for anyone or anything they disagree with?

The best way to neuter the Left is to treat them in the exact same way they treat their enemies.

Anonymous said...

QUOTABLE QUOTES

"I rise today to express grave doubts about the Obama Administration's counterterrorism policies and programs. Counterterrorism is often shrouded in secrecy, as it should be, so let us judge by the results. In barely four years in office, five jihadists have reached their targets in the United States under Barack Obama: the Boston Marathon bomber, the underwear bomber, the Times Square Bomber, the Fort Hood shooter, and in my own state — the Little Rock recruiting office shooter. In the over seven years after 9/11 under George W. Bush, how many terrorists reached their target in the United States? Zero! We need to ask, 'Why is the Obama Administration failing in its mission to stop terrorism before it reaches its targets in the United States?'"
Freshman Congressman Tom Cotton (R-AR)

Yeah!!

Anonymous said...

Hi colleagues, its fantastic paragraph about tutoringand
entirely explained, keep it up all the time.

my blog post: raspberry ketone diet

Anonymous said...

Sadly, this is no surprise.
Those who hate the First Amendment demand complete respect for their point of view while denouncing and silencing any opposing viewpoint.

Anonymous said...

The big difference is that Bush deserved to be mocked. After all, he started two wars, 911 happened on his watch, his Patriot Act took away constitutional freedoms, the economy cratered, torture was the norm, etc., etc., etc.

Anonymous said...

Liberals demand respect. Conservatives earn respect.

Anonymous said...

Well, of course US Presidents are seen differently from one succeeding generation to the next (as with all historical figures).

Anonymous said...

There are other differences Anon 12:47. Bush was born in America, and unlike his successor, he's not a Marxist.

Anonymous said...

"Bush was born in America, and unlike his successor, he's not a Marxist."

A typical anti-American birther.

Dean said...

The birther thing - who knows?

Marxist - definitely.

Anonymous said...

It was abundantly clear to anyone paying attention that Obama was not competent to be President before he was first nominated.

Anonymous said...

2:32 - and Sara Palin was? LOL

Anonymous said...

"Marxist - definitely."

Dean is talking out of his ass again.

Dean said...

2:32 - IIRC Sarah Palin was running for vice president. A fact most liberals are unable to grasp.

4:02 - So you do believe Obama was born outside the U.S. I'm still not certain.

The marxist thing - no question about it.

Anonymous said...

McCain was. Comparing Palin, you'll have to ask if you want Gaffie Joe as POTUS?

Anonymous said...

The biggest problem with this poster is that there is no 'your' and 'my' president.
The President is the President of the United States of America.
That makes him 'our' President (for all the Americans on here) whether you like him or not.
Of course, that does not mean you have to agree with everything he says.

Anonymous said...

It's a silly rule that a prospective President of the USA must be born within the current borders of same (which seem to get rather vague). Surely being a US citizen is enough to be both a voter and a candidate for any political office. (Or after being a citizen for a given number of years).

Use the Name, Luke said...

The purpose for the President being required to be a natural born citizen is to avoid putting someone with divided loyalties into such a position of power.

Anonymous said...

So Luke, with that logic, what do you make of second or third generation natural-born American citizens who often show as much or more loyalty to the country their recent forebears came from, such as Israel or Pakistan, etc., etc.?