Monday, October 01, 2012
Christian speech riles atheists
Again. But answering speech with speech is fine
The Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF), an atheist activist non-profit, is advertising a new billboard that uses gay themes to argue against faith in the public sphere. The ad, which reads, “Ban Marriage Between Church and State,” was erected in Smithville, Missouri, in response to a separate, Christian sign reaffirming that marriage is between one man and one woman.
The new 14 by 48 foot atheist ad uses a rainbow, a symbol familiar to the gay community, to make its case. The “Ban Marriage Between Church and State” billboard was recently placed near an ad put up by Catholic Radio that reads, “1 Man, 1 Woman, Forever.”
Smillville resident Matt Gaines employed the FFRF to post the message after he saw the Catholic Radio ad and contended that it is overtly offensive to homosexuals.
Source
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
Anything and everything they disagree with is overtly offensive to homosexuals, which is why we should never take them seriously. Radical gay activists are simply the modern day version of the Nazi Gestapo, except with limp wrists.
“Ban Marriage Between Church and State”
I like it. Just get the government out of the marriage business, picking winners and losers, and leave it to the churches. There are hundreds of religions and people choose the one they agree with. If their church decides to marry gays, then they can choose a different church. Or they can be like most religions and go to war with and slaughter each other.
Get the state out of the "marriage business" altogether. They should only be worried about "Civil Unions" anyway.
See my blog: Get the State Out of the Marriage Business
No where in the U.S. CONSTITUTION is there anything about the separtation of CHURCH & STATE
"Islam is not a good religion gone bad. It has been evil from day one."
Of course Luke will say that since he believes that the one true religion is Jesus based. All other religions (and non religions) is shit.
All religious people think their own religion (and even their own version of their religion) is the correct one. So what's the odds that any one of them is correct?
Atheists also think that their view is correct and everyone else is wrong. That's not unique to religious people.
There's a reason for that. It's called the Law of Non-Contradiction. Only one (at most) view can be right. There's nothing irrational about it.
Even three-year-olds understand this principle on a basic level. ("Is not!" "Is too!" "Is not!" "Is too!") So why is this so surprising to you?
Because the odds against Luke's own religious views being more correct than the numerous other religious views around - let alone non-religious views - are astronomical!
Besides, a-theism is merely non-acceptance of theism, not a view in itself, even if some "atheists" also propose other views.
Arab Palestine Nazism:
* 'Falastin', April 4, 1933, expressed appreciation for Nazi leader Adolf Hitler vs Arab Palestinian leaders.
* 'Falastin', May 1933, calls Hitler "noble", justifies his persecution of the Jews.
* El Karmel, [Karmil] May 14, 1933 : "Will an Arab Hitler appear among us to awaken, unite and lead us to lead us to fight and defend our rights?"
* Al-Difa had long published translated excerpts from Hitler's Mein Kampf's book, glorified Nazis, al-Shanti, called on Arab youth (in an article from June 1, 1934) to "learn from Hitler's actions and imitate them
* March 15, 1935, The Templars' 'Die Warte des Tempels' wrote: many Arabs saw Hitler as the most important man of the 20th century and almost every Arab knew his name. Fascism and National Socialism with its anti-Jewish attitude were accepted positively by many Arabs.
* May-June 1935, Arabs in Haifa found Nazi club 'Red Moon.'
* June 25, 1935, Al Difa'a reported that "uniformed and Nazified" Arab youth troops are being formed in Palestine.'
* 'Falastin'', January 5, 1936: "It is very easy to explain our youth's sympathy for the fascist idea."
* 1936-8: "Nazi flags and pictures of Hitler were prominently displayed in store windows. Booklets explaining Nazi methods of forcing Jews from the Reich were distributed freely... The shout of 'Heil Hitler' became a catchword which rang insolently over all Palestine." (Ziff, 'The Rape of Palestine', 1938).
* NYT May 1937, 'All' of Palestine celebrated Muhamnad's birthday with flying Nazi swastika and pictures of Hitler.
* 1937, Walter Doehle, German consul in Jerusalem: "Palestinian Arabs in all social strata have great sympathies for the new Germany and its Führer…"
* Awni Abd al-Hadi (Istiqlal & AHC) in Jan 1937 to Nazi magazine : 'Arabs Like Nazis.'
* 'Falastin', Sep 16, 1938, reacting to Hitler's speech, describes dictatorship as against [sic] Jewish so-calped control.
* 1938, 100 Arabs, including from Pakestine, represented in Nuremberg.
* Journalist J. Gunther in 1939: "The greatest contemporary Arab hero is — Adolf Hitler."
* Ahmad Shukeiri's testimony in his (1969) book that they (all) sympathized with the Nazis referrin to (1940-1).
* Feb. 1941 poll - 88% of Arab-Palestine favoring the Axis.
* Dr. Zaid Hamzeh was 9 yrs old in 1941): "We Arabs supported Hitler during WWII because he hated the Jews," recalled in a 2019 interview.
* Per Edward Said, pro-Nazi Mufti represented the consensus of Palestine Arabs.
* CIA August 1942 report: "majority of the Arabs in Palestine Palestinian Arabs are fiercely 'anti-Jewish'… the radicals, who form a majority, see in the approach of Rommel an ideal opportunity to murder all Jews their seize their property."
* Dec 21, 1942 letter, representatives of the Reich and the NSDAP in Palestine described the Arabs' hope for a great Arab state: "Arabs in Palestine were waiting for Hitler to come to Palestine and expel all the Jews."
Post a Comment