This must be some of the worst bullsh*t I have ever heard
And you thought NASA was about exploring outer space! Not in Obamaland.
"In a far-reaching restatement of goals for the nation’s space agency, NASA administrator Charles Bolden says President Obama has ordered him to pursue three new objectives: to “re-inspire children” to study science and math, to “expand our international relationships,” and to “reach out to the Muslim world.”
Of those three goals, Bolden said in a recent interview with al-Jazeera, the mission to reach out to Muslims is “perhaps foremost,” because it will help Islamic nations “feel good” about their scientific accomplishments.
In the same interview, Bolden also said the United States, which first sent men to the moon in 1969, is no longer capable of reaching beyond low earth orbit without help from other nations.
“NASA is not only a space exploration agency,” Bolden concluded, “but also an earth improvement agency.”
Source
39 comments:
So, the National Air and Space Association no longer deals with air and space? It seems these three goals should be for the National Science Foundation, not NASA.
Perhaps the Marxist-in-Chief feels we should organize and pay for Afghanitans space program? Or maybe put an Iranian terrorist on the moon? Or, how about giving all of our space technology to N. Korea, China, and Russia? (assuming there's something they haven't already stolen) I'll bet even the diehard Obamunists out there can't come up with a rational explanation for this move. That's not to say there isn't one.
It's been very clear to many of us that, from the time he was anointed, Mullah Obummer had two main goals.
1) to take the wealth from those who earn (Whites) and give it to those who simply want it. (blacks)
2) to let his Muslim brothers around the world know that he's really one of them, and he's on their side.
How i long for the old days in America when corrupt, lying, anti-American politicians were taken out into the yard and introduced to a tall tree and a strong rope. Simplicity is the key to effective solutions. Very effective!
Speaking of stealing technology - NASA was built on stolen Nazi rocket technology and the german scientists kidnapped by the US.
So what? We won the war. To the victor go the spoils! Besides, the Germans didn't have the technology to go to the moon. WE developed the technology for that feat by building on the primitive rocket technology.
As an employee for a subcontractor under NASA, this truly makes me ill. After seeing this article earlier this week, I had serious reservations about taking some time off. Unfortunately, Obama's economy overruled that thought.
MSM is trying hard to ignore this one too.
3:36 AM - looks like the Americans are just midgets sitting on the shoulders of foreign giants when it comes to the technolgy and culture they claim to be theirs.
NASA has a bigger budget than NSF. You drink from the deeper well.
First ditching the shuttle program in favor of hitching rides with the Russians.
Now this.
NASA = No Americans in Space Anymore
4:00 AM - Name-calling. Typical leftist mis-direction from the topic due to the lack of a reasonable argument.
Sorry, 3:18 AM got me distracted from the true nature of this topic. It is another sign of Pres. Obama's low opinion of America that he says we are unable to accomplish great things on our own. I refuse to believe that and know that America can do anything it sets it's mind to. We are still the greatest nation on Earth regardless of what our so-called leader says.
4:17 AM - you're a typical American jingoist! Waving your stars-and-stripes with blinkered determination even as the US ship of state sinks beneath the waves!
What the f*ck ever happened to Separation of Church and State? Oh, that's right, it only applies to Christians. This is no less than government endorsement of Islam, plain and simple. It is so huge a travesty that President Obama should be impeached for violating his oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution. Oh wait, that's right. He never actually took the oath...correctly.
"it will help Islamic nations “feel good” about their scientific accomplishments."
---I had no idea making bombs was a scientific accomplishment. Or perhaps we could give then a Nobel for testing the theory of gravity by throwing rocks?
You know, maybe it's time to defund NASA. Why not? It's just another government bureaucracy, we haven't even been back to the moon and the space station looks worst than one of those Indian reservations without casinos.
Let's face it, it's the private sector who's gonna make space exploration possible in the future. Google "Virgin Galactic" if you don't believe me.
By the way, I thought it was the job of teachers to "re-inspire" children to study science and math.
But maybe I'm wrong, if NASA is going to "re-inspire" the kids to study science and math then perhaps the Department of Education can handle the space program. Why I'm sure science teachers would make great astronauts, and those cafeteria ladies? Maybe we can give them liposuction and turn their fat into fuel for those rocket boosters.
It was conservative Justice Roberts that flubbed the oath. It was administered correctly later on.
Obama Oath of Office
If you don't like the CNN reference above, try
the Fox News version.
1. "He wanted me to help re-inspire children to want to get into science and math"
2. "He wanted me to expand our international relationships"
3. "Third, and perhaps foremost, he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science ... and math and engineering."
-NASA Administrator Charles Bolden
Hmmm... now what is missing from each of these three mission statements?
Oh, I don't know. How about the word "SPACE"?!
---I had no idea making bombs was a scientific accomplishment.
You may want to look up Alfred Nobel, after whom the Nobel Prize is named.
It's just another government bureaucracy, we haven't even been back to the moon and the space station looks worst than one of those Indian reservations without casinos.
Because we all know the value of a space vessel is based on how attractive someone who turns down jobs to stay unemployed says it is.
Let's face it, it's the private sector who's gonna make space exploration possible in the future. Google "Virgin Galactic" if you don't believe me.
I don't believe you and neither do most people. Virgin's efforts used existing technology to achieve their low trajectory orbit. They didn't invent anything, maintain anything or contribute anything back into the US society in general. NASA supervises contracts and scientific experiments that permeate life as we know it today.
By the way, I thought it was the job of teachers to "re-inspire" children to study science and math.
You have to give kids something to point to. Space exploration, landing on the moon, science, etc are all things that NASA does and that teachers can point their students toward.
I guess you would rather see a teacher say "see? If you do nothing, you too can be unemployed from the advertising sector!"
Maybe we can give them liposuction and turn their fat into fuel for those rocket boosters.
Or we could just use the hot air and gas that you spew forth.
"You may want to look up Alfred Nobel, after whom the Nobel Prize is named."
---I know, dynamite, which replaced nitroglycerin which was a very unstable substance. Now, have arabs invented anything better than dynamite? I don't think they invented C4.
"Because we all know the value of a space vessel is based on how attractive someone who turns down jobs to stay unemployed says it is."
---Answer me this, why do we have rich people paying the Russians millions of dollars to take them into space? Why are so many satellite makers using the french to launch their satellites into space?
"NASA supervises contracts and scientific experiments that permeate life as we know it today."
---Yet they're getting their funding cut, go figure.
"You have to give kids something to point to. Space exploration, landing on the moon, science, etc are all things that NASA does and that teachers can point their students toward."
---And how many billions of dollars are we gonna have to spend to point things out to children? Why not take a libertarian approach and let those kids who are oriented towards science study science while others study art and others go to wood shop class, math, calculus, whatever.
"I guess you would rather see a teacher say "see? If you do nothing, you too can be unemployed from the advertising sector!"
---There you go again with the personal attacks, with the "I am so superior to you because I am not unemployed." Karma's a bitch, buddy, you could find yourself unemployed, and then we'll see how arrogant you get to be.
Obama has ruined the economy, 9.6% unemployment means there are less job that pay less money with more people fighting for them, some of them with way more than 5 years of experience.
---I know, dynamite, which replaced nitroglycerin which was a very unstable substance. Now, have arabs invented anything better than dynamite? I don't think they invented C4.
Thanks for the diversion. It is expected from you.
---Answer me this, why do we have rich people paying the Russians millions of dollars to take them into space? Why are so many satellite makers using the french to launch their satellites into space?
Geez, what a moronic comment from you. You do realize that both the French and the Russian space programs are socialized more than that of the US, right?
---Yet they're getting their funding cut, go figure.
I agree. Go figure. Instead of actually funding jobs that produce benefits for society and keep people working, you and your liberal friends would rather cut funding to NASA, see launches go overseas, and pay more unemployment benefits to slackers like you with no return on investment.
---And how many billions of dollars are we gonna have to spend to point things out to children?
We could spend nothing and have the best engineering minds go overseas. Is that what you want?
Why not take a libertarian approach and let those kids who are oriented towards science study science while others study art and others go to wood shop class, math, calculus, whatever.
So under your theory, we shouldn't fund libraries, because writers shouldn't have books to read and inspire them. We shouldn't fund museums, because artists should not see great works of art. That's what you're saying, right? Just keep examples of greatness away from kids so they can only aspire to be... ummm.... to be..... what?
Karma's a bitch, buddy, you could find yourself unemployed, and then we'll see how arrogant you get to be.
Arrogant? You are talking about arrogance when you turned down a job because it didn't pay you what you felt you are worth? Instead of taking the job and being a productive member of society, you decided to keep living off the taxpayer teat? And now you want to talk about "arrogance?"
Obama has ruined the economy, 9.6% unemployment means there are less job that pay less money with more people fighting for them, some of them with way more than 5 years of experience.
And you are doing SOOOOOO much to help it by turning down jobs that you think are beneath you.
You're not any sort of Libertarian. You are just a liberal who thinks that you are owed something from everyone else.
---I know, dynamite, which replaced nitroglycerin which was a very unstable substance. Now, have arabs invented anything better than dynamite? I don't think they invented C4.
Thanks for the diversion. It is expected from you.
---Answer me this, why do we have rich people paying the Russians millions of dollars to take them into space? Why are so many satellite makers using the french to launch their satellites into space?
Geez, what a moronic comment from you. You do realize that both the French and the Russian space programs are socialized more than that of the US, right?
---Yet they're getting their funding cut, go figure.
I agree. Go figure. Instead of actually funding jobs that produce benefits for society and keep people working, you and your liberal friends would rather cut funding to NASA, see launches go overseas, and pay more unemployment benefits to slackers like you with no return on investment.
---And how many billions of dollars are we gonna have to spend to point things out to children?
We could spend nothing and have the best engineering minds go overseas. Is that what you want?
Why not take a libertarian approach and let those kids who are oriented towards science study science while others study art and others go to wood shop class, math, calculus, whatever.
So under your theory, we shouldn't fund libraries, because writers shouldn't have books to read and inspire them. We shouldn't fund museums, because artists should not see great works of art. That's what you're saying, right? Just keep examples of greatness away from kids so they can only aspire to be... ummm.... to be..... what?
Karma's a bitch, buddy, you could find yourself unemployed, and then we'll see how arrogant you get to be.
Arrogant? You are talking about arrogance when you turned down a job because it didn't pay you what you felt you are worth? Instead of taking the job and being a productive member of society, you decided to keep living off the taxpayer teat? And now you want to talk about "arrogance?"
Obama has ruined the economy, 9.6% unemployment means there are less job that pay less money with more people fighting for them, some of them with way more than 5 years of experience.
And you are doing SOOOOOO much to help it by turning down jobs that you think are beneath you.
You're not any sort of Libertarian. You are just a liberal who thinks that you are owed something from everyone else.
---I know, dynamite, which replaced nitroglycerin which was a very unstable substance. Now, have arabs invented anything better than dynamite? I don't think they invented C4.
Thanks for the diversion. It is expected from you.
---Answer me this, why do we have rich people paying the Russians millions of dollars to take them into space? Why are so many satellite makers using the french to launch their satellites into space?
Geez, what a moronic comment from you. You do realize that both the French and the Russian space programs are socialized more than that of the US, right?
---Yet they're getting their funding cut, go figure.
I agree. Go figure. Instead of actually funding jobs that produce benefits for society and keep people working, you and your liberal friends would rather cut funding to NASA, see launches go overseas, and pay more unemployment benefits to slackers like you with no return on investment.
---And how many billions of dollars are we gonna have to spend to point things out to children?
We could spend nothing and have the best engineering minds go overseas. Is that what you want?
Why not take a libertarian approach and let those kids who are oriented towards science study science while others study art and others go to wood shop class, math, calculus, whatever.
So under your theory, we shouldn't fund libraries, because writers shouldn't have books to read and inspire them. We shouldn't fund museums, because artists should not see great works of art. That's what you're saying, right? Just keep examples of greatness away from kids so they can only aspire to be... ummm.... to be..... what?
Karma's a bitch, buddy, you could find yourself unemployed, and then we'll see how arrogant you get to be.
Arrogant? You are talking about arrogance when you turned down a job because it didn't pay you what you felt you are worth? Instead of taking the job and being a productive member of society, you decided to keep living off the taxpayer teat? And now you want to talk about "arrogance?"
Obama has ruined the economy, 9.6% unemployment means there are less job that pay less money with more people fighting for them, some of them with way more than 5 years of experience.
And you are doing SOOOOOO much to help it by turning down jobs that you think are beneath you.
You're not any sort of Libertarian. You are just a liberal who thinks that you are owed something from everyone else.
"Geez, what a moronic comment from you. You do realize that both the French and the Russian space programs are socialized more than that of the US, right?"
---I know that, I also know that if a private business wants to launch a satellite, he's more likely to do it with the Russians, or the French. After all, the French aren't trying to make us feel good about our accomplishments in art nor are the Russians celebrating our ability to brew vodka.
"I agree. Go figure. Instead of actually funding jobs that produce benefits for society and keep people working, you and your liberal friends would rather cut funding to NASA, see launches go overseas, and pay more unemployment benefits to slackers like you with no return on investment."
---They are GOVERNMENT JOBS, those are precisely the jobs we don't need. People who work for NASA are highly sought-after in the private sector, they shouldn't have any problems finding a job. Tell me, do you only support small government when it comes to things you don't like?
"We could spend nothing and have the best engineering minds go overseas. Is that what you want?"
---Don't be so overdramatic, do you know how many chinks we have studying at MIT? Our colleges attract the best and brightest from the entire world, space exploration is a very small component in the field of science.
You want to explore space? You have to do it like a business man. Open the space station to tourism, raise money, and then fund future ventures.
"So under your theory, we shouldn't fund libraries, because writers shouldn't have books to read and inspire them."
---If the free market wants a library let them build it and pay for it. Why should I be paying so some retired old woman can borrow Agatha Christie paperbacks? I'd rather go to Borders or Barnes & Noble or Amazon.com than a library. Those places are nicer.
"We shouldn't fund museums, because artists should not see great works of art."
---There are plenty of Museums that charge admissions fees, rent their spaces to private parties, and compete in the free market without government help. I went to the Atomic Museum in Las Vegas, paid $20 bucks but it was worth it. Of course, comrade anonymous wants the government to fund museums, how surprising.
"Geez, what a moronic comment from you. You do realize that both the French and the Russian space programs are socialized more than that of the US, right?"
---I know that, I also know that if a private business wants to launch a satellite, he's more likely to do it with the Russians, or the French. After all, the French aren't trying to make us feel good about our accomplishments in art nor are the Russians celebrating our ability to brew vodka.
"I agree. Go figure. Instead of actually funding jobs that produce benefits for society and keep people working, you and your liberal friends would rather cut funding to NASA, see launches go overseas, and pay more unemployment benefits to slackers like you with no return on investment."
---They are GOVERNMENT JOBS, those are precisely the jobs we don't need. People who work for NASA are highly sought-after in the private sector, they shouldn't have any problems finding a job. Tell me, do you only support small government when it comes to things you don't like?
"We could spend nothing and have the best engineering minds go overseas. Is that what you want?"
---Don't be so overdramatic, do you know how many chinks we have studying at MIT? Our colleges attract the best and brightest from the entire world, space exploration is a very small component in the field of science.
You want to explore space? You have to do it like a business man. Open the space station to tourism, raise money, and then fund future ventures.
"So under your theory, we shouldn't fund libraries, because writers shouldn't have books to read and inspire them."
---If the free market wants a library let them build it and pay for it. Why should I be paying so some retired old woman can borrow Agatha Christie paperbacks? I'd rather go to Borders or Barnes & Noble or Amazon.com than a library. Those places are nicer.
"We shouldn't fund museums, because artists should not see great works of art."
---There are plenty of Museums that charge admissions fees, rent their spaces to private parties, and compete in the free market without government help. I went to the Atomic Museum in Las Vegas, paid $20 bucks but it was worth it. Of course, comrade anonymous wants the government to fund museums, how surprising.
"That's what you're saying, right? Just keep examples of greatness away from kids so they can only aspire to be... ummm.... to be..... what?"
---That is not my problem, seriously, right now you're sounding like Hillary "it takes a village to raise a child" Clinton. No Hillary, it doesn't take a village, it takes one or two responsible PARENTS. Besides, there are plenty of examples of greatness that don't bankrupt the country. Really, you need to stop being so wasteful, America is broke, yet you're acting like a typical politician that doesn't want to make cuts if it affects the pork project on his district.
"'Arrogant? You are talking about arrogance when you turned down a job because it didn't pay you what you felt you are worth?"
---It was a strategic decision, a man with 5 years of experience doesn't work for $30k if he wants his next job to pay more than $50k. At that salary i'm better off going into another career.
"Instead of taking the job and being a productive member of society, you decided to keep living off the taxpayer teat? And now you want to talk about "arrogance?"
---I live off my savings, you don't know anything about me, my family, or my background.
"And you are doing SOOOOOO much to help it by turning down jobs that you think are beneath you."
---It's basic supply and demand economics. If ClearChannel wants to attract talented copywriters, they should offer $45,000 to $65,000. At $30,000 all they're going to get is young ad school graduates who are desperate for the job and don't have a mortgage to pay. And you know what? It's gonna be hard attracting them because most copywriters I know HATE writing radio and do not want to be in a company where that's the only thing you do. And by teh way, some of those ad school graduates are getting jobs that pay $45k even $75k if they're very talented and have won lots of wards. So please, don't lecture me on what jobs I should take. I know what I'm worth, and that number isn't $30,000.
"You're not any sort of Libertarian. You are just a liberal who thinks that you are owed something from everyone else"
---No I'm not. I'm a libertarian who believes in small government, who hates government waste, who trust the free market, who loves guns, and who supports individual freedom as opposed to collectivism.
Bobby cares about no one but himself. Libertarians do not make good lifeguards.
"Oh. So you would rather support socialist governments than the government of the US. Got it."
---You know, when my buddies buy guns, we don't buy American guns or Russian guns, we buy the best guns. If NASA wants to remain competitive in the free market, THEY have to change, they have to fly billionaires into space, they have to launch satellites at competitive prices, they have to improve without demanding yet another bailout.
"Another statement from ignorance from you. NASA administers contracts. Those contracts are with private companies. In other words, when you stop funding NASA, you stop growth in the private sector as well."
---The private sector doesn't need to grow at the expense of the public sector, that is not what America is all about. You know, I'm not surprised you don't like Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh or John Stossel, your comments are very telling.
"Ah yes, the racism comes out. Actually, it doesn't matter where people study, we are talking about where they go to get jobs."
---A lot of those ASIANS stay in America, althoguh I did read that thanks to our extremely high corporate tax rates a lot of venture capitalists are going outside the USA. Gee, no wonder you want to give NASA more money, thanks to Obama, a man can't make it today without a cushy government connection.
"So you would shut down the Smithsonian, the National Gallery, etc? So in your mind some kid should have to pay to see great works of art? Some kid should have to pay to be inspired?"
---I don't need to shut them down, those places are very popular, even if they charge a $20 admission fee people are still gonna go to see them. By the way, how do you feel about the NEA funding artworks like "piss christ," a statue of Jesus in a vat of urine. See, instead of letting the people decide what is a great work of art, we have government bureaucrats funding garbage. Thanks a lot.
"Seriously, you couldn't be more wrong and more selfish. That is typical you though. You don't care about others. You only care about yourself."
---I guess you want to spread the wealth, right? Tell me, is this the land of the free or the land of the generous?
"Clearly you never read the book or you would know how false an accusation this is. But then again, truth was never your strong suit."
---I don't need to read her book, life is too short to waste my time with the ramblings of a politician.
"Thank you for proving it was arrogance."
---I didn't know self-respect and self-worth was arrogant. Besides, I've been applying to jobs outside of advertising. My philosophy is that if I can't make $45k-$60k working in advertising, I'm gonna switch to another career even if it means starting at the bottom. However, I am not going back to the bottom in my profession.
"Sorry Bobby, you have already said that you were taking unemployment. Caught in another lie, you'll deflect this as well."
---I never said that, I've always said "my savings."
"Yet everything that you debate is the opposite of those beliefs.
Oh well."
---Funny, I could say the same about you. You're a so-called "conservative" yet you don't want to make cuts in the budget. Tell me, would you want to pay a national sales tax of 2% to 5% to finance NASA? I know how government works, not only is that tax going to make everything more expensive, but government will probably steal the money, waste it on other projects, and then demand more money from the taxpayers.
This is not the cold war, we already won the race to the moon and nobody else is racing to Mars. So let's stop all romantic notions about NASA and cut their budget.
"Oh. So you would rather support socialist governments than the government of the US. Got it."
---You know, when my buddies buy guns, we don't buy American guns or Russian guns, we buy the best guns. If NASA wants to remain competitive in the free market, THEY have to change, they have to fly billionaires into space, they have to launch satellites at competitive prices, they have to improve without demanding yet another bailout.
"Another statement from ignorance from you. NASA administers contracts. Those contracts are with private companies. In other words, when you stop funding NASA, you stop growth in the private sector as well."
---The private sector doesn't need to grow at the expense of the public sector, that is not what America is all about. You know, I'm not surprised you don't like Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh or John Stossel, your comments are very telling.
"Ah yes, the racism comes out. Actually, it doesn't matter where people study, we are talking about where they go to get jobs."
---A lot of those ASIANS stay in America, althoguh I did read that thanks to our extremely high corporate tax rates a lot of venture capitalists are going outside the USA. Gee, no wonder you want to give NASA more money, thanks to Obama, a man can't make it today without a cushy government connection.
"So you would shut down the Smithsonian, the National Gallery, etc? So in your mind some kid should have to pay to see great works of art? Some kid should have to pay to be inspired?"
---I don't need to shut them down, those places are very popular, even if they charge a $20 admission fee people are still gonna go to see them. By the way, how do you feel about the NEA funding artworks like "piss christ," a statue of Jesus in a vat of urine. See, instead of letting the people decide what is a great work of art, we have government bureaucrats funding garbage. Thanks a lot.
"Seriously, you couldn't be more wrong and more selfish. That is typical you though. You don't care about others. You only care about yourself."
---I guess you want to spread the wealth, right? Tell me, is this the land of the free or the land of the generous?
"Clearly you never read the book or you would know how false an accusation this is. But then again, truth was never your strong suit."
---I don't need to read her book, life is too short to waste my time with the ramblings of a politician.
"Thank you for proving it was arrogance."
---I didn't know self-respect and self-worth was arrogant. Besides, I've been applying to jobs outside of advertising. My philosophy is that if I can't make $45k-$60k working in advertising, I'm gonna switch to another career even if it means starting at the bottom. However, I am not going back to the bottom in my profession.
"Sorry Bobby, you have already said that you were taking unemployment. Caught in another lie, you'll deflect this as well."
---I never said that, I've always said "my savings."
"Yet everything that you debate is the opposite of those beliefs.
Oh well."
---Funny, I could say the same about you. You're a so-called "conservative" yet you don't want to make cuts in the budget. Tell me, would you want to pay a national sales tax of 2% to 5% to finance NASA? I know how government works, not only is that tax going to make everything more expensive, but government will probably steal the money, waste it on other projects, and then demand more money from the taxpayers.
This is not the cold war, we already won the race to the moon and nobody else is racing to Mars. So let's stop all romantic notions about NASA and cut their budget.
"No. How about getting out of Iraq and Afghanistan immediately and cut the Pentagon's budget. Your pal Bush put us there, that son-of-a-bitch."
---You do remember 9/11, don't you? There IS a reason we're fighting in the arab world. Either we fight them there or they'll bring the war here.
"NASA's accomplishments are things that I am proud of as an American, not those mideast wars."
---So you're not proud of the work our soldiers are doing in Iraq and Afghanistan? You're not proud of how we freed the Kurds from a dictator, of how women in Afghanistan no longer have to wear burkas if they don't want to, of how we got rid of dictators that used to torture people.
I assure you that our soldiers know why they're fighting and why they must win.
"Get your priorities straight, you selfish bastard."
---My priorities are security and fiscal responsibility. The war is a necessity, space exploration is a luxury. America cannot afford more luxuries.
If NASA wants to remain competitive in the free market, THEY have to change,
NASA's job is not to compete in the "free market." NASA's mandate is one of scientific research. The fact that many of the experiments, research and products result in marketable products is secondary.
they have to improve without demanding yet another bailout.
NASA is not a company demanding a "bailout." Clearly you don't understand the issues.
---The private sector doesn't need to grow at the expense of the public sector, that is not what America is all about.
I agree. That is why NASA is not about growing the private or public sectors.
You know, I'm not surprised you don't like Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh or John Stossel, your comments are very telling.
Actually, Limbaugh, Beck, and Stossel all support the space program and NASA. Geez it must suck to be you - having to lie all the time.
---I don't need to shut them down,
Yet that is what you advocate.
---A lot of those ASIANS stay in America,
More racism.
Gee, no wonder you want to give NASA more money, thanks to Obama, a man can't make it today without a cushy government connection.
Once again, you clearly have no idea of what NASA does.
---I guess you want to spread the wealth, right?
See, that is simply more selfishness from you. You seem to believe that making opportunities available for others and inspiring others somehow diminishes all. In some ways it may diminishes you, because clearly you cannot ascribe to be anything other than at person who lives in their mother's basement, cant get a date without paying for it, and can't keep a job.
Tell me, is this the land of the free or the land of the generous?
It is both. We have great opportunity and are a people of great generosity. Once again, you demonstrate that you are the one that doesn't believe in the American ideal.
---I don't need to read her book
So your statement was based on ignorance. Typical of you.
---I didn't know self-respect and self-worth was arrogant.
Saying a job is beneath you is arrogance.
However, I am not going back to the bottom in my profession.
You aren't working. You are living off the tax payer teat. You don't have a profession.
You're a so-called "conservative" yet you don't want to make cuts in the budget.
Really? Where did I say that? Or is it your opinion that we should cut everything other than the money you suck off the rest of us while you turn down jobs?
This is not the cold war, we already won the race to the moon and nobody else is racing to Mars. So let's stop all romantic notions about NASA and cut their budget.
That is the problem with people like you. You think that is all that NASA does.
That is why it is impossible to ever discuss things with you. You display your ignorance and your willingness to lie to make a point over and over.
Most adults have some sort of morality. Clearly your parents never taught you any.
"I agree. That is why NASA is not about growing the private or public sectors."
---NASA is growing from the private sector, they don't generate their money in the free market, they take it from the government who takes it from the private sector through taxation.
"Actually, Limbaugh, Beck, and Stossel all support the space program and NASA. Geez it must suck to be you - having to lie all the time."
---Stossel is a libertarian, I doubt he supports it with public money. If you have evidence that says otherwise, use it.
"Yet that is what you advocate."
---No, I advocate cutting the budget across the board, and that includes NASA.
"More racism."
---Great, so now you're playing the race card. You should be ashamed of such cheap tricks. Real men debate, they don't call each other "racist."
"See, that is simply more selfishness from you. You seem to believe that making opportunities available for others and inspiring others somehow diminishes all."
---You sound just like Obama. Now there's a man who loves spreading opportunities. I was watching Suze Orman and I learned that in 2014 if you take a student loan and then decide to work for the government, you only have to pay your loan during 10 years, and after that your loan is gone EVEN if you still own money.
You think it's fair for some people to pay a student loan for 20 or 30 years while others only pay during 10 years and then get a free ride? That's great, that's like buying a house with a 30 year mortgage, getting a government job, and not having to pay your mortgage after 10 years.
"It is both. We have great opportunity and are a people of great generosity. Once again, you demonstrate that you are the one that doesn't believe in the American ideal."
---INDIVIDUALS have the choice of being generous, government isn't supposed to be. Most of the money donated to the victims of the tsunami came from PRIVATE individuals who made donations voluntarily. After 9/11, nobody was asked to donate blood yet countless Americans stood in line for hours out of their own free will. You want charity? Ask your parents for money, not the government.
"Saying a job is beneath you is arrogance."
---Fine, I'd like to see your wife working as a prostitute. I'd like to see your daughter doing porn. Since no job can ever be beneath you, I'd like to see if that's true.
"You aren't working. You are living off the tax payer teat. You don't have a profession."
---I am living of my parents and of my savings. I have never taken a dime out of the public teat.
"Clearly your parents never taught you any."
---Didn't your parents teach you not to talk about other people's parents? The difference between you and me is I don't mess with people's families.
"Real men debate, they don't call each other "racist." "
What's there to debate? You cannot argue with a fact, Bobby. And that fact is that you ARE a racist. Your words prove that time and time again.
"---I've had sex with women of different races, how the hell can I be a racist?"
How much did they cost?
"He's always saying that my parents raised me wrong and that I live in a basement."
Oh, poor baby. Go cry to your mommy.
"How much did they cost?"
---Anywhere from $20 to $150. Which is not a bad deal considering how expensive "decent" women are.
Either way, after my multiple purchases I've come to the conclusion that blue eyed blondes is what I like best. Does that make me a racist? If so, I guess that must make Tiger Woods a racist since we both seem to have a thing for blondes.
Of course, I doubt Mr. Suburbia approves of my lifestyle. No, good decent suburbian citizens bring their hookers to a Motel 6, away from the prying eyes of neighbors.
You condemn me for my honesty, yet your world is filled with lies and pretense. I once saw a bachelor party at a strip bar, you know what the groom did? He had 20 different women sat on him, one after the other.
You know, I thought marriage was supposed to be about love, how the hell can a groom claim to love his wife when he has sex or a lap dance with another woman on the night before the wedding?
The hell with that, I'm happy with my life, I'm happy I don't have to apologize for my actions like Tiger Woods did. I'm happy I didn't have to go on TV and say "I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky."
I pity those men, they are such hypocrites. How can Tiger talk about being ashamed when it's clear to me he enjoys having multiple women? If he's ashamed of anything is of getting caught and perhaps facing an expensive divorce.
Men like me are honest and free. We say what we mean and mean what we say, we march to the beat of our own drum without asking the church and society for permission.
---NASA is growing from the private sector, they don't generate their money in the free market, they take it from the government who takes it from the private sector through taxation.
NASA is not "growing" at all. That is what you fail to understand. NASA administers contracts.
---Stossel is a libertarian, I doubt he supports it with public money. If you have evidence that says otherwise, use it.
Sorry, but you made the claim that those guys hated NASA. The proof is not on me. I have actually heard them support NASA. You, on the other hand, made up another lie to try and make a point, but you got caught.
(And by the way, Stossel had a report on Fox on July 4th called "What Is Great About America." One of the things he named was NASA. Daggone it really sucks to be you getting caught lying all the time.)
---No, I advocate cutting the budget across the board, and that includes NASA.
So you say that you aren't advocating cutting things and then say that you want to cut across the board. Flip flop much?
---Great, so now you're playing the race card. You should be ashamed of such cheap tricks. Real men debate, they don't call each other "racist."
What race card? The race card is playing a victim. I am not doing that. I am calling you out on your racist and prejudicial comments. Do your parents know that you are a racist?
---You sound just like Obama.
If that is the conclusion you have reached, then you aren't listening.
You see, Bobby, employing people is creating opportunities for people. I believe that such employment is good for people and society. You believe that jobs are beneath you. You want to talk about not paying back student loans (which I abhor) and yet there you are, thrilled that your liberal buddies want to extend unemployment so you can live off the rest of us longer.
---Fine, I'd like to see your wife working as a prostitute.
That's funny. You just equated your advertising profession to prostitution. I guess with all the sex you have paid for, it is a logical comparison in your mind.
cont.
---I am living of my parents and of my savings. I have never taken a dime out of the public teat.
Well, aren't you da MAN! Thirty five years old and living with mommy in her basement, paying for sex and taking money from unemployment while sipping lattes at Starbucks.
---Didn't your parents teach you not to talk about other people's parents? The difference between you and me is I don't mess with people's families.
I have only drawn the logical conclusions from your immature and selfish remarks and actions, Bobby. I am not the one messing with your family - you are. You are the one whose actions and morals disgraces them. If that truth bothers you, that is not on me - that is on you.
You can attack my views, you can attack me, but if you attack my family then you're gonna see a side of me you're not gonna like.
What side is that, Bobby? The side that lies? The racist side? The side that thinks they are superior to everyone? The side that is unemployed and turns down jobs? The side that lives in the basement with his mommy? The side that can't debate anything? The side that has to pay for friends and companionship? The side that won't stand up for what they believe? The side that tells others how to live, but takes affront at imaginary slights? The side that thinks that walking on a treadmill should be an Olympic event? The side that demands that businesses be run a certain way but never ran a business? The side that can't read a box on a printer?
I have seen that side and so has every one else.
So what side are you going to show me, Bobby?
Post a Comment