Feminist Canadians: Pamela Anderson's new PETA ad banned for treating actress like a piece of meat
It was MEANT to! Those are some confused Canadians. Feminists just don't like good-looking women is what it is all about. Even PETA can't trump that hatred
"Pamela Anderson's racy new vegetarian advertisement for pressure group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) was banned today in Canada for being "too sexist".
The New York Daily News said the animal rights ad features the 43-year-old Baywatch star posing in a blue string bikini with her body parts marked with labels including "rump", "breast" and "ribs" - accompanied by the slogan "All Animals Have the Same Parts".
Canadian officials rejected the campaign in Montreal at the 11th hour today claiming the ad went against the equal rights of men and women. "It is not so much controversial, as it goes against all principles public organisations are fighting for in the everlasting battle of equality between men and women," an official wrote in an email to PETA.
Source
7 comments:
I do wonder why PETA doesn't use men like they use Pamela Anderson, sounds to me like PETA doesn't think men are pretty.
Is "everlasting" a synonym for "unwinnable"?
Just wondering.
Maybe PETA doesn't use men because the men who have the worthy bodies are NOT vegetarians ... I'm just saying' ...
What matters to this crowd is that they get to feel good about themselves without actually doing an actual good thing for anyone.
Think of it as spiritual parasitism.
If they would have used a photo of some sexy man, do you think the outrage would be as great?
If they would have used a photo of some sexy man, do you think the outrage would be as great?
Interesting question. I have no idea.
There is apparently a really sick subgenre of pornography which depicts the cannibalization of women. Some of this material showed up on a USENET newsgroup dedicated to reprinting European comic book erotica about a decade ago.
Sick. Sick. Sick.
Who wants to eat silicone breasts?
Post a Comment