Tuesday, September 25, 2012


On Bourbon Street you can show everything (but your faith)

On October 26, 2011, the city of New Orleans criminalized religious expression on Bourbon Street.

Subsequently, in May of this year, a preacher from Vieux Carre Assembly of God Church was told by police that he could not continue discussing religion on Bourbon Street, even though he had been preaching there for the past 30 years every Tuesday and Friday evening.

The new rules were quietly put in place when Mayor Mitch Landrieu approved a ban on loitering or congregating “for the purpose of disseminating any social, political, or religious message between the hours of sunset and sunrise.” Individuals convicted of violating this ban can be imprisoned for up to six months.

Six months in prison, for speech?

This is not simply a Mayor suspending constitutional rights but also punishing anyone who tries to live out those rights. In other words, in a city where you can show everything, the new rule is you can show everything but your faith.

Moreover, it’s not up to the government to decide which topics we can and cannot discuss. The First amendment protects an individual’s freedom of speech. Jurisprudence supports this, tradition supports it, and the history of New Orleans supports it.

Just think about these things as you look at the landscape in and around the Big Easy. It’s a city that is literally full of chapels, cathedrals, religious statues and ornaments, and even an NFL team named the Saints.

Moreover, New Orleans and the state of Louisiana are so rich with religious overtones that the city sits in a parish rather than a county. (New Orleans is located in Orleans Parish.)

Yet, since the ban went into effect, several people have been arrested or threatened with arrest for communicating a religious message on Bourbon Street. Fearing arrest, the pastor has stopped going to Bourbon Street to discuss his faith.

When you consider that the ban on sharing a “religious message” covers the hours between sunset and sunrise, it’s hard to avoid the conclusion that the darkness is being protected. And it really is a shame for the Mayor to go to all this trouble, to pass bans on speech and rabidly enforce them, all to be sure the darkness is dark indeed.

The freedom to show everything on Bourbon Street ought to apply to preachers who want to show light as well.

Source

SCOTUS would knock it on the head but getting before SCOTUS is hugely expensive

14 comments:

Anthony Billings Art said...

So, where's the ACLU when we REALLY need them?

Bird of Paradise said...

The evils of liberalism the disease called secular humanism

Anonymous said...

One word sums it up: Money

If you let someone express their (Constitutionally-protected) religious views, it could cause someone intending to engage in immoral activities at certain establishments to not engage in those activities, thus depriving those certain establishments potential revenue. And because those establishments pay sales taxes to the city, the religious person is therefore depriving the city of potential tax revenue.

Anonymous said...

Are bar owners and strip club owners allowed to pass out handbills promoting their businesses during these hours? If so, then it IS discrimination. If ALL such solicitations are banned, then this really is a non-issue.

Anonymous said...

Yes, taking this clear-cut violation of the Constitution to the SCOTUS would be very expensive for the average person, (which is probably why they did this) but, if hundreds or thousands of people went to Bourban St. and exercised their Constitutional rights, the city would back down in about 3 minutes.

Think it's a coincidence that Mayor Landrieu is related to the "very liberal" state senator?

Anonymous said...

The weaker the people become, the stronger govt. becomes. Soon, you will only be allowed to worship that which the govt. approves of. In the end, weak people always get exactly what they deserve.

Anonymous said...

Wow - the ACLU 'should' be all over this, but won't be. Will at at least still be acceptable to sing praises unto Obama on Bourbon St?

Anonymous said...

Apples are a fruit no diffrence between them and ORANGES,PLUMS,PEACHES and GRAPES

Anon7:44 said...

Pardon me, I forgot to capitalize APPLES in the post above.

Anonymous said...

I wonder how this affects the palm readers and vodoo trinket shops that lines Bourbon street. They may have to declare them non-religious (i.e. fake) or get arrested. Guess The Big Easy is now The Big Brother.

Anonymous said...

Palmists and Voodoo practitioners would probably simply state that what they do is not religious, but a way of life. I doubt they enjoy the same tax status as churches do.

Anonymous said...

Should not require the expence of a SCOTUS appeal. One pastor arrested appealing his conviction should be able to overturn the law at the first court he appeals it to. There is no way the city would try to fight it through the court system. They would certainly lose.

Anonymous said...

again we see that liberals don't really care about freedom when it isn't in their interest.

Anonymous said...

You saw how liberal cities bent over backwards to serve the OWS crowd.