Must not even ASSOCIATE with people who criticize homosexual behavior
We read:
"Howard Shultz, the CEO of Starbucks, has unexpectedly backed out of a planned address at this week’s Willow Creek Global Leadership Summit.
Some are questiong if Shultz’s decision, which is still not reflected on the summit’s web site, is based upon a recent petition that was launched by Asher Huey, a liberal political consultant. In his petition, Huey labeled the house of worship “anti-gay” and railed against Shultz’s participation.
In describing his initiative on the progressive Change.org web site, Huey writes:The church that is sponsoring the event on August 11th and 12th has a long history anti-gay persecution. For decades the church was a member of Exodus International, the organization that seeks to cure homosexuality through dangerous conversion therapy.
The church split ways with the group, but in doing so stated that it wasn’t a change in belief but a change in focus. The church also has their own “outreach” programs to the LGBT community to spread their anti-lgbt message.
While questions are certainly being raised about the petition‘s involvement in Shultz’s decision not to attend, at present Huey has only collected 787 signatures (and that’s after a week of the poll being posted).
Source
2 comments:
This is simply another example of how radical gay activists use intimidation (and liberal courts) to force their beliefs and lifestyle on others.
They are well aware of the fact that, when given the opportunity to make their voices heard, the overwhelming majority of Americans do not agree with that lifestyle, (see: Prop-8 in CA.) nor their constant demands to be "legislated into a special, privileged class", with rights and protections, (such as "hate crime" laws) not afforded to the rest of society.
The top priorities for radical gay activists are;
a) forced acceptance by all
b) special treatment/protections
c) and above all, RECRUITMENT!
Don't think for one minute that they will stop.
Well, he is free to associate with whom he chooses and if he is influenced by something or some group in that respect - so what - as anyone or group has the right to influence any other if peacefully done and within the law.
Post a Comment