My totally "incorrect" heading above completely contradicts an impression that the media has laboured to build up. Most media stories about the British rioters highlight middle class whites. Blacks are rarely mentioned.
One hard-working geographer has however mapped out all the known data about the rioters and where they rioted and superimposed that map on maps of London demographics. He finds that the toxic combination is race and poverty. Poor blacks were the main culprits. Poverty alone was not an important factor as there was little rioting in poor white areas. The big riots were mostly in poor black areas and most of the rioters were poor blacks
His conclusion:
Both theoretical and empirical evidence shows that it is improper to disconnect the August 2011 riots from race and ethnic culture. It is, likewise, inappropriate to associate it with the uneducated, low-skilled white lower class ('chavs'). It was severely underrepresented in the riots, and did not produce riots in numerous poor non-black areas. None of the socioeconomic factors have the same predicting power as black ethnicity in this case. In fact, they are meaningless to the riots when not a correlate of black population.
Why the black community played such a prominent role in the riots may be disputed. But it is clear that role of the black community was greater than that of any other group, and it should be accordingly regarded in the media.
7 comments:
Yeah rite - "poor" people can afford i-phones and blackberries, pcs and the latest technology, so they know where to congregate for a potential riot and looting.
The film footage of looters and rioters showed their ethnic backgound all too clearly.
"Why the black community played such a prominent role in the riots may be disputed..."
Daniel Patrick Moynihan kenw why way back in 1965. He wrote about the breakdown of the black family and pointed out the problems stemming from a ~20% or so out-of-wedlock birthrate. He predicted that welfare would hasten the demise and destruction of the black family. For this prediction he was soundly denounced as a racist. Fast forward to 2011, black o-o-w births are around 70% and white o-o-w births are now where the blacks' were in 1965. I don't recall the name of the book (or perhaps it was a paper), something like "The State of the Black Family", something like that.
In fact, in many of America's cities where blacks make-up a large percentage of the population, out-of-wedlock births are something of an industry. Black men impregnate several women each, knowing that with each child comes an increase in the welfare and food stamp payments. The men then go around every month and collect a portion of those payments from each woman. This has been going on for a very long time.
Although "Anonymous" is mostly right... I must be honest.. I've never known a black man to get a piece of his "baby-momma's" welfare... however, it does seem to be a badge of honor to have impregnated multiple women
sperm-machines with legs to run away after dispensing the product in the required recepticle
Sorry for the typo - should have been "receptacle" - of the organic type.
Post a Comment