Friday, June 15, 2012
Must not criticize homosexuality -- again
To Leftists, homosexuals seem to be what Mohammed is to Muslims. Any criticism is an outrage and must not be uttered. Free speech be damned
Teen radio host, Caiden Cowger, is causing an online rage with his YouTube video, "Obama is making kids gay." The video was removed after it was deemed to be full of hate speech, but Cowger quickly posted it again on June 7 under a new channel.
While YouTube seems to be having a hard time stopping Cowger from producing more videos, Spreaker, a company that is the audio equivalent of YouTube, has taken steps to make sure he can't spread his gay bashing on their site. The company removed Caiden Cowger's content on Friday, June 8, pulling the 14-year-old's radio program.
Spreaker CEO, Francesco Baschieri states, "While we not only support free speech, we help it find its way to more people faster and easier with our service that is the audio equivalent of YouTube, but like them, we cannot and will not condone hate speech. Consequently, we have pulled down audio content from Caiden Cowgar, whose recent gay-bashing clearly crosses the line from free -- to hate -- speech.”
Caiden Cowger slammed the Obama adminstration during his video rant, saying "I'm going to tell you this, guys: President Obama...Vice President Biden...is making kids gay!"
Cowger, who cites Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck as his influencers, calls homosexuality "a perverted belief, it's immoral and not natural ... The person is not born that way, no matter what Lady Gaga says...it is a decision."
Source
He may be right or he may be wrong but in any case you are not allowed to hear what he says, apparently. Only your "superiors" can make your mind up for you
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
23 comments:
So called "hate speech" is free speech, the dumbasses.
To these eletists FREE SPEECH belongs to them alone one one else
Any one who would say that Limbaugh and Beck are their role models should be put in a rubber room.
The leftists have a problem here. If Homosexuality is a "choice," then this kid is right. If it's not a choice, then there may be a way of correcting the genetic defect and "curing" it. I always hear that nobody would "choose" to be homosexual, but I imagine that the announcement of some scientist identifying the "gay gene" and a subsequent "gay vaccine" would be met with even more vociferous reaction that this kid has experienced. And the left would explode in an apoplectic fit of confusion if there ever comes a day when a woman can perform a "gay" test on her unborn child....
Stan, clever
Sets up a straw man, and then only provides examples to suit his own desired outcome, while ignoring all other examples.
It has long been the goal of the Left to control, not only thought, but speech as well. And, with the help of their supporters in the MSM and our education systems, they've come a very long way in doing just that.
But should the Left be blamed, or should the blame go to the weak, gullible, and sheep'ish people who have all but given up their ability (and right) to think for themselves?
Yes, we know the Left envisions an America that is some imaginary utopia, a place that is void of religion, void of patriotism, void of self-respect and any sense of personal responsibility, and of course, void of anyone or anything that does not "totally" agree with their views. Anyone who can still think for themselves can see signs all around us that they are well on their way of accomplishing their goal. Like terrorism, all the Left requires for success is, a weak and gullible population.
Now you know one of the reasons why America is circling the drain.
especially Stan B
News flash libs, hate speech IS free speech.
you may not like it, I may not like it, but that's the way it is.
I am gay, i believe homosexuality is not a choice, i did not fill out an app. i would be str8 if i could, but i believe this kid has every right to say what he believes in the public forum. Loud mouth liberals can spew their hatred all day on youtube,etc.
nobody would choose to be a heroin addict or a pedophile or a bank robber but people DO choose those things.
Did 9:48 PM choose his/her sexuality or what attracts sexually? Is he/she able to choose another one at will that is genuine?
Anon 2:50, sounds like you have a lot of questions, sounds like you're confused.
Anon3:38, whose pissed? I laugh at you, cretin. LOL
It's really starting to feel like the serious commenters are being outnumbered by the trolls, to the point where they're trying to troll each other. When does the sun come up around here?
3:39 AM - Why don't you answer the question? Did you actually make a conscious deliberate choice as to whether you are sexually attracted to women or to men or to some other type of person or thing?
Interesting study results:
Two daddies dilemma
Study pokes holes in same-sex parenting propaganda
University of Texas sociology professor Mark Regnerus‘ findings, based on the lives of nearly 3,000 randomly selected American young adults, measure social, emotional and relationship outcomes in 40 categories. Among the 2,988 people in the study, 175 were raised by lesbian mothers and 73 by homosexual fathers. Mr. Regnerus‘ results soundly refute the claim that all households are equal when it comes to raising children. Compared to adults from married-mom-and-dad homes, those raised by lesbian mothers had negative outcomes in 24 of 40 categories and those raised by homosexual fathers had negative outcomes in 19 of the 40 categories.
It is a decision, science agrees with me. pwnage.
2:55 AM said, "Did you actually make a conscious deliberate choice as to whether you are sexually attracted to women or to men or to some other type of person or thing?"
There are two elements to the answer: Scientific and social.
It is an accepted scientific fact that a "normal" sexual drive is one with a partner of the opposite sex. This is shown in most of nature, and cannot be denied. Deviance from this natural norm does occasionally naturally occur, but such deviance is not representative of the species in general.
So the first part of the answer is "no". Because I am straight, I am driven to sexual attraction of the opposite sex--a drive that is consistent both historically and naturally. The homosexual that deviates from this norm naturally, they represent only a small part of the species at large.
The second part of the answer is "yes" because I was taught, as people from the beginning of time have been taught, that the "normal" sexual attraction is heterosexual sexual attraction. This natural and social consistency validates my natural attractions with the social norms, so my actions and drives are considered "normal". To the homosexual, there is an inherent conflict between the natural physical drive and the socially accepted and promoted order. This conflict can be resolved either by going against the natural drives, or going against the accepted and established social order. But which should we choose to go against?
We are all social creatures by the design of our Creator, and part of our gift as "higher creatures" is that we have the ability to overcome physical deviance and handicap. For example, a person who has lost movement in his legs learns to adapt to the physical and social norms that surround him. Yes, accommodations are often made to help him, but we make those accommodations to help this person to better fit into normal society rather than to separate him as a crippled individual. A homosexual is no different: He suffers from a physical deviance that, through social and educational assistance, we can help him fit in better with normal society, as opposed to heartlessly singling him out.
So Luke - What about the statistics about children whose Mom & Dad divorced and their ngeative feelings and emotional damage? - not to mention the numerous cases of children being abused by step-fathers!
I guess, as usual, who are very selective in your prejudice!
Luke is a serious commenter? No fucking way. LOL
2:25 AM - Amazing! You have just used arguments that the Nazis used in another scenario!
Anon 3:46, we DO accept and freely acknowledge that many people have a differing sexuality. If you want to enjoy your deviant sexuality, then go ahead and do so. If you want to express yourself emotionally and sexually to a same-sex partner, go ahead. Just don't FORCE me to accept it as "normal" because it is not.
And stop already with the pathetic Nazi allusions, as they simply don't apply. Nazi Germany was Hell-bent on eliminating those who were against the Nazi regime. We are not trying to eliminate you. We simply want to prevent you from re-defining what is considered "normal".
How do you prevent people from opposing what you define as normal other than to have laws suppressing what other people define as normal - and then you are well on the road to a fascist regime!
Post a Comment