UCLA confirms student can thank Jesus in graduation statement
We read:
"On May 21, Dr. Pamela Hurley, student affairs advisor for the Molecular Cell and Developmental Biology Department at UCLA, e-mailed all graduating students to collect short personal statements from them that she would read as they crossed the stage to receive their degree at the June 13 department commencement ceremony. Hurley informed students that the statements, called “Words of Wisdom,” could contain “almost anything,” including expressions of gratitude, UCLA experiences, family acknowledgements, favorite quotes, etc. She added that some of the most memorable statements were “fanciful” or “outrageously wild,” but suggested that students bypass political, derogatory, or “specific religious expression.”
Popa opened her proposed statement with, “I want to thank my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ,” before thanking her deceased father and other family members for their encouragement, and closed with her future career plans.
Hurley responded in an e-mail that UCLA observes the “separation of church and state,” and that instead of reading, ‘I want to thank my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ,’ Hurley would only allow, ‘First, I want to thank God.’” When Popa objected, Hurley said the only other option was to read none of Popa’s comments at the ceremony.
After ADF attorneys wrote to the school over the matter on Friday afternoon, Popa received a voice mail on Friday evening saying that she would be allowed to read her comments as originally written. The university confirmed this by letter Tuesday.
Source
8 comments:
They keep trying, don't they, especially out there in Mexifornia. The Left won't be happy until every reference to Christianity is removed from our society and culture. That is, until the lawyers show up. Then, and only then, do they exibit the tolerence they demand from everyone else.
Sadly, Anon 1:43 is correct. It seems that schools in particular are bound and determined that nobody will be allowed to mention Christian topics. Somehow anyone who does is assumed to be proselyting.
We won't have achieved true freedom of religion until any sect is allowed to freely speak of their beliefs, or give thanks to their particular deity whenever they wish and have that acceptede as merely a statement of faith.
It's beyond me why anyone is offended to hear someone say, "Allah be praised," or "Happy Hannuka", or "Merry Christmas," or "I thank Christ for . . .".
But it appears there ae bigots who feel nobody should believe differently than they.
Funny, i haven't heard anyone say they were offended by references to allah or hannuka. In fact, they wouldn't dare, since that would be hate speech. Religious freedom? Yes. For some.
Dean, that would depend on what you're praising Allah (or Jesus, or whomever) for.
For helping you make it through university, noone should be offended.
For giving you the courage to go out and kill 300 Marines in Beirut though...
Funny how it is OK to say "god" but not "Jesus". I guess "god" would be so generic it could mean any god and therefore not offensive to anyone but atheists. Oops, better not even say "god"!
I wonder what whould happen if someone did a survey of the American people to find out which word they find more offensive, God, or atheist. Of course, you would first have to find someone who is capable of conducting an honest survey, which leaves the MSM out.
Jesus, thanks for nothing.
The school caved on that one rather easily because they realized (with some prodding) that student written comments are not officially sponsoring religion.
The sad thing is that an institution of higher learning wasn't able to determine that without the prodding.
Post a Comment