Strange new experience: Freedom of speech upheld in Germany
We read:
"A popular website that lets students rate their teachers will remain online after a court ruled against a complaint. Germany's federal court of justice rejected the case of a woman who argued her rights had been infringed by pupils who gave her bad grades.
It found that the rights of the woman, a teacher of German and religion, had not been compromised by the ratings and that pupils had a right to offer an opinion as long as they did not hinder her professionally. "The opinions expressed are neither abusive nor insulting," the court said in a statement. "The plaintiff did not show that she had been harmed in any specific way."
The court said collection, storage, and transmission of ratings by online portal spickmich.de was therefore permissible without the assent of the plaintiff.
The website allows students to award teachers marks on a scale from one (very good) to six (unsatisfactory), the same scale on which German pupils are graded. Categories assessed include "cool and funny," "popular," "motivated," "human," and "good teaching."
The lawyers of the woman, who had been given a rating of 4.3 for her German teaching, argued that the site was unfair and inaccurate because users rate subjects anonymously. This could lead to multiple ratings by the same person, as well as ratings by people with no connection to the school or teacher in question, they argued.
But the court said in this case, the right of the individual to express an opinion outweighed these concerns.
Source
Good that there are some such cases.
1 comment:
This could have a very chilling affect, in that it could force teachers to have to be competent, now that they too are being graded. Excellent decision.
Generally speaking, in public education, everything imaginable (books, funding, classroms, seats, and of course, pupils) is blamed for poor performance from students. Everything that is, except imcompetent teachers, since they are always protected by their unions.
Post a Comment