Monday, June 29, 2009



Canadian "Human Rights" boss exemplifies what she is denying

We read:
"Canadians are uninformed and deliberately misinformed about the hate speech provisions of human rights law, and are engaged in a debate that is "completely unbalanced," according to Jennifer Lynch, chief commissioner of the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

"We welcome this debate. We want it to be an informed debate in the right forum, a place where people can have an informed dialogue. [That place is] Parliament, and parliamentary committees. This why we did a special report to Parliament [last week]. That's the appropriate forum," she said in an interview.

She criticized Conservative MP Russ Hiebert for relying on "one source that is full of misinformation," in his study of the CHRC in a parliamentary subcommittee. But she placed most of the blame on conservative author Ezra Levant and his blogging allies for spreading "misinformation" about the CHRC's mandate and practices.

Source

The stupid b*tch can't even hide her biases when she tries. She wants to restrict all debate to Parliament: None of that nasty public speech stuff. Nobody interested in the topic is "misinformed" about her odious regime. We have all seen the shallow and biased grounds on which Ezra Levant and Mark Steyn were targeted. If she wants respect for her fief she should cease all harassment of political speech.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

She is just telling the world that she's a true "do as i say not as i do" leftist. She would have been a big hit in the Berlin of the late 30's.

Toejam said...

Pelosi, Boxer and Sotomayor all rolled into One!

Anonymous said...

THIS JUST IN;

The SCOTUS has just (reversed) Judge Sotomayors openly-racist decision in the Conn. firefighters case. Justive Kennedy wrote the opinion for the majority.

Supreme Court vs. Sotomayor [Ed Whelan]

Judge Sotomayor thought it appropriate to use an unpublished summary order to dispose of the claims of the New Haven firefighters in Ricci v. DeStefano. Today the Supreme Court issued 93 pages of opinions in the case that Sotomayor acted to bury.

Further, although there is a sharp 5-4 divide among the justices, "not a single justice" thought that Judge Sotomayor acted correctly in granting summary judgment for the City of New Haven.