School sued for punishing teens over racy MySpace pix
We read:
"INDIANAPOLIS: Two American high school girls have sued their school district after they were punished for posting sexually suggestive photos on MySpace during their summer holiday.
The American Civil Liberties Union, in a federal lawsuit filed last week on behalf of the girls, argues that Churubusco High School violated the girls' free speech rights when it banned them from extracurricular activities for a joke that didn't involve the school. They say the district humiliated the girls by requiring them to apologise to an all-male coaches' board and undergo counseling.
Some child advocates argue that schools should play a role in monitoring students' behaviour, especially when dealing with minors. And the US Supreme Court has ruled that students can be disciplined for activities that happen outside of school, so long as the school can prove the activities were disruptive or posed a danger and that it was foreseeable the activities would find their way to campus.
In the Indiana case, the ACLU argues that the district and Churubusco Principal Austin Couch went too far in banning the two students from sports, requiring them to apologise to the all-male coaches' board and undergo counselling after the photographs were circulated at school.
The lawsuit, filed in US District Court in Fort Wayne, names Couch, the high school and the district as defendants and seeks unspecified damages. No hearing has been scheduled.
ACLU legal director Ken Falk insists the Churubusco case doesn't warrant the punishment the district handed out. "We all did things when we were sophomores in high school that can be construed as immature or problematic or whatever, but that is not the issue here," he said. "The issue is what possible impact this could have on the school environment, and the answer is none."
The girls, identified only by their initials in the suit, took the photos during a sleepover with friends before school started this summer and posted them on their MySpace pages, setting the privacy controls so only those designated as friends could view them. In the photos, the girls wore lingerie and pretended to lick a penis-shaped lollipop. None of the photos made any reference to the school.
The ACLU argues that the Indiana case is different. They say the photos were a joke intended to be shared only with friends. It wants the school district to expunge all references to the incident from school records and seeks to bar the school from taking similar action in the future.
Palfrey, of Harvard, said schools have a right to regulate students' online behaviour but said the court will have to decide whether the students' First Amendment rights were violated.
Source
7 comments:
Help me out here- why exactly would a school monitor online activities, when such activities are expressly private (ie- deliberate "friend-only" viewing?), outside of normal school operating hours, and when activities were done apart from School equipment (ie- their computers/systems were not used).
If the pictures caused a disturbance at school, shouldn't those who caused the disturbance should be held accountable, not those who created the pictures?
"Palfrey, of Harvard, said schools have a right to regulate students' online behaviour". Huh?
Does the term "invasion of privacy" come to anyone's mind? If viewing these photos was limited to only those who had authorization to look at them, then these "EduNazi's" went way over the line. There may also be a problem with a little thing called "The First Amendment".
Sue them into oblivion!
I agree with the ACLU on this one, furthermore the school went too far:
"it banned them from extracurricular activities for a joke that didn't involve the school."
---Which is only going to give the teens more time to get in trouble. Good thinking, school!
"They say the district humiliated the girls by requiring them to apologise to an all-male coaches' board and undergo counseling."
---Was that necessary? The girls already had to deal with the fallout from their families, apologizing to a coaches board for behavior at home is going too far.
monitor online activities???
how about texting?
phone conversations?
Schools have 1 purpose. To Educate. They're failing at that one thing because they're trying to tell them what to think instead of how to reason.
~darko
Darko, that's old fashioned thinking. Today, schools do not educate. They indoctrinate, which is why the entire system is a failure.
QUOTABLE QUOTES
"The aim of public education is not to spread enlightenment at all; it is simply to reduce as many individuals as possible to the same safe level, to breed a standard citizenry, to put down dissent and originality."
– H. L. Mencken
That Quotable Quote from H.L. Mencken is exactly why one should homeschool one's kids - to keep them from being hit with the "stupid" stick of public "education".
Post a Comment