British Royal family set to gain new admirers
The many people who are sick and tired of the pursed-mouth reaction to any reference to race have had Prince Harry to applaud lately -- and now Prince Charles sets an example of harmless frankness too:
"Britain's royal family is embroiled in another race row after reports the Prince of Wales calls a friend "Sooty". Prince Charles used the "affectionate nickname" to address Kolin Dhillon, whose family come from the Indian subcontinent, at Cirencester Polo Club, Britain's The Daily Telegraph reported. "Charles, along with both of his boys, have called this chap Sooty because it is his nickname and he is perfectly comfortable with it," an un-named member of the club told the newspaper.
Source
6 comments:
One of Prince Charles' ancestors was called "The Black Prince" - guess we'll have to amend the history books!
Who knows, maybe some day, when people regain their senses, we can stop all this PC bullshit and be normal again. No, i don't think so either!
Obviously the Prince does not understand that no term of endearment is safe, and one must use only a person's legitimate, ethnically correct name.
So if you're African-American, and your name is Europeanized (i.e. Smith, Jones, or something like that) then you must take a uniquely African name for your own, and we, the oppressive regime members, may only call you that!
You realize that if we had elected John Kerry as our president in 2004 we would have had the first African-American first lady.
As for the tempest surrounding the princes Harry and his dad, Charles, what are the British people going to do about these "racial slurs", fire them? Would that I had a job that paid me £14 million per year and from which I couldn't be fired! I have always thought that we should have a figurehead monarchy in the United States. It would provide us with many hours of scandal to discuss and a receptacle for our adoration instead of lavishing it upon pop tarts such as Hayden, Paris, Nicole, Britney and the Heidis.
"It would provide us with many hours of scandal to discuss and a receptacle for our adoration instead of lavishing it upon pop tarts such as Hayden, Paris, Nicole, Britney and the Heidis."
---The difference is that all those pop tarts worked very hard to be famous. The monarchs are born into it, but Paris had to be seen at every party for the media to start caring about her. Britney had to audition for the Mickey Mouse Club and bet thousands of talented girls for that job.
The british on the other hand, worship a bunch of lazy good for nothing blue bloods.
Even the Kennedy's do more than those royal inbreeds.
But the royals don't have to whore their way, or claw their way, to the top like celebs and politicos, motivated by their own vanity. The royals are born to their status and could opt for a private life, but instead many work hard representing and promoting their countries and charitable causes(at the least the senior ones do - younger ones may act a bit foolishly but we were all young and foolish once!)
Post a Comment