Wednesday, November 26, 2008



Washington State regulators want to regulate bloggers

We read:
"Bloggers beware? State regulators are wondering whether online political activism amounts to lobbying, which could force Web-based activists to file public reports detailing their finances. In a collision of 21st century media and 1970s political reforms, the inquiry hints at a showdown over press freedoms for bloggers, whose self-published journals can shift between news reporting, opinion writing, political organizing and campaign fundraising.

State officials are downplaying any possible media rights conflict, pointing out that regulators have already exempted journalistic blogging from previous guidelines for online campaign activity.

But the blogosphere is taking the notion seriously. One prominent liberal blogger in Seattle is already issuing a dare - if the government wants David Goldstein to file papers as a lobbyist, it will have to take him to court. Goldstein, publisher of the widely read horsesass.org, wants to know how his political crusades could be subject to financial disclosures while newspaper writers, radio hosts and others in traditional media get a pass.

Source

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

I bet they don't even give DailyKos a first look though.

Anonymous said...

I bet the Huffington Post gets a pass also.

Anonymous said...

Don't worry, the so-called Fairness Doctrine will solve all this by allowing only the Left the ability to blog, comment, report, and discuss. Welcome to the new Amerika!

Anonymous said...

Sounds like an idea copied from one that's currently being discussed in the European Parliament which would require bloggers (and anyone else "publishing content" on the internet) to have a license and submit their "work" for approval by EU "regulators" who will decide whether publication is allowed or not.

The idea there is to "improve the quality of the internet by reducing the amount of lies and other untrue information being published", in other words to control what can be said so that only the official point of view of the EU central command gets any exposure.

Anonymous said...

There are already laws regarding libel and slander.

How about - when a newspaper makes a mistake, the correction must be printed/displayed as prominently as the original story?

That may encourage some papers to be more thoughtful before making a bald statement, then posting a retraction on page Z-32 in 4 pt type.

Anonymous said...

fatburningfurnace -
fat burning furnace -
fat loss 4 idiots -
final sync -
firewall gold -
fitness model program -
fit over 40 -
fit yummy yummy -
flattenyourabs -
flatten your abs -
forex candlesticks made easy -
forex killer -
forex megadroid -
get rid of your cellulite -
g money pro -
google shadow -
governmentregistry -
government registry -
gov resources -
health biz in a box -
homemadeenergy -
home made energy -
hybrid water power -
i software tv -
joyful tomato -
keyword spy pro -
kingdom of pets -
macro virus -
malware bot -
maternityacupressure -
maternity acupressure -
meet your sweet -
microcap millionaires -
moles warts removal -

Anonymous said...

reverse mobile -
reverse phone detective -
richard mackenzie direct -
rich garbage man -
rocket chinese -
rocket french -
seize cars -
shop until you drop -
six figure yearly 2009 -
sleep tracks -
spyware nuker -
spyware stop -
sunshine 4u -
the bad breath report -
the cash1234 system -
thedietsolutionprogram -
the diet solution program -
the free car -
the lazy marketer -
tonsil stones remedies -
truth about abs -
truth about diets -
turbulence training -
vincedelmontefitness -
vince del monte fitness -
violin master pro -
warp speed fat loss -
wedding speech 4u -
xp repair pro -
yeast infection no more -
2ip hosting -
10 minute forex wealth builder -
30 minute back links -
500 love making tips -