Sunday, November 09, 2008




Judge Bans Use Of "Illegal" and "Aliens"

This is very much in keeping with the usual Leftist fantasy that changing the word for a thing changes both the underlying reality and people's attitude towards it. In fact, the new term rapidly acquires all the associations of the old. Already, I am not the only one to use "undocumented" derisively, for instance.
"Arizona's Supreme Court Justice has agreed to enforce the Hispanic Bar Association's demands of banning the terms "illegal" and "aliens" in all of the state's courtrooms. Claiming that the terms are inflammatory, the president of Arizona's Hispanic Bar Association, (known as Los Abogados) has asked state Supreme Court Chief Justice Ruth McGregor to stop using them at trials or hearings because they create perceptions of judicial bias.
"The Webster's dictionary defines the adjective "alien" as "belonging or relating to another person, place, or thing" and the noun "differing in nature or character typically to the point of incompatibility". This is exactly what is intended. The denial of using this language is itself prejudicial. This goes to the core of the debate. They are "alien" and "different". "Illegal" is also not allowed"

In a strongly worded letter to the chief justice, Los Abogados' president says attaching an illegal status to a person establishes a brand of contemptibility, creates the appearance of anti-immigrant prejudice and tarnishes the image of courts as a place where disputes may be fairly resolved.

It further points out that no human being is illegal and that a national Hispanic journalism association has roundly criticized the reference for dehumanizing a segment of the population. The letter goes on to criticize the state's High Court for using the term "illegals" in at least two opinions and the term "illegal aliens" in dozens of others.

It concludes with a list of acceptable and unacceptable terms relating to illegal immigration. Among those the group wants banned are; immigration crisis, immigration epidemic, open borders advocates, anchor babies and invaders. Among the acceptable terms are foreign nationals, unauthorized workers and human rights advocates.

Source

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

So the Courts can no longer declare anything "Illegal?" Then we do not need the lawyers to argue in the courts what is illegal and what is not?

Anonymous said...

I guess people will be identified as "lawfully disabled"

Mike said...

Wait a minute! If this is true, then all lawyers are out a job!!

Anonymous said...

What this brain-dead judge has done in fact, is to void the First Amendment. Now, our language will be "cleansed" of all words foreigners don't like. How about making the words Barack Hussein Obama illegal?

Anonymous said...

Well lets stop calling them illegals and start calling them invaders who don't belong here! How's that? Like that better?

Anonymous said...

I wonder what history will say about the American people who sat and watched TV while their country was taken away from them?

Anonymous said...

George Orwell was a man far ahead of his time!

"IN NAME OF FREEDOM WE'RE ENSLAVED!"

Anonymous said...

"I wonder what history will say about the American people who sat and watched TV while their country was taken away from them?:

The same thing I doe every time I turn on the news...

Noting...just weep!

Anonymous said...

Ayn Rand was equally prophetic... I just finished re-reading "Atlas Shrugged". Anybody got diretions on how to get to Galt's Gulch?

Anonymous said...

They're not "illegal aliens" either. The legal question concerns their right to be in the country not their alien status. The correct phrase ought to be illegal immigrant.