Friday, August 31, 2018
Medical Website Indulges Trans Community With New Term For Female Genitalia
Sounds rather rude. It's part of the endless Leftist campaign to deny reality
A health information site titled Healthline, which serves a reputed 85 million people a month, is offering an “LGBTQIA Safe Sex Guide” that stipulates the word “vagina” is no longer appropriate for that part of the female genitalia. Instead, the proper term for that orifice is . . . “front hole.”
But why, you may ask? Why is a term that has been used for ages suddenly jettisoned in favor of the term “front hole?” The LGBTQIA Safe Sex Guide writes:
"For the purposes of this guide, we’ll refer to the vagina as the “front hole” instead of solely using the medical term “vagina.” This is gender-inclusive language that’s considerate of the fact that some trans people don’t identify with the labels the medical community attaches to their genitals."
As Jonathon Van Maren writes at Lifesite News:
Women who claim they are men, but are still anatomically female, feel that accurately labeling their genitals is problematic because they “don’t identify” with the medically correct terms. In other words, they accurately fear that if someone knows they have a “vagina,” those people will assume (quite safely) that they are female, when they have decided that they are not.
The term “front hole” has been bandied about for a while; last January Bustle quoted “sex educator” Kenna Cook pontificating, "Language for sex that is coded in anatomy is meant to reinforce a heteronormative, reproductive-based idea of sex … The terms people use for their sexual body parts are a large contributor to them feeling comfortable engaging in certain sex acts. Some trans men don't refer to their genitals with female-coded language, opting for 'boy hole' or 'front hole.'”
Anyone who promulgates that heteronormative, reproductive-based idea of sex should just shut their piehole.
Or else they’re just a rectum, or whatever you call it.
SOURCE
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Normal people should not be accommodating those with twisted minds !
If this were even 1% of the population, and science supported the idea that it was beneficial to change medical terminology to help those affected by Gender Dysphoria, then we MIGHT consider it.
But it's not, and there's no evidence that obfuscating the clear Medical Designations can in any way lessen a sufferer's cognitive dissonance. This isn't science - this is madness.
a homosexual in a dress is not attractive to the men they crave. Its just a sexual perversion which shouldn't be celebrated
They have their head up their "rear hole!"
Anyone who denies that heteronormative, reproductive-based idea of sex should just shut their piehole.
When one face palm just isn't adequate.
Post a Comment