Wednesday, February 08, 2012

Academic sparks outcry for comparing Britain's colonisation of New Zealand to Holocaust

We read:
"A leading academic has sparked outrage after comparing the Holocaust that killed six million Jews to Britain's colonisation of New Zealand. Language lecturer Keri Opai claimed that New Zealand's native indigenous Maori were suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder following the 'holocaust' of British rule.

But last night the President of the New Zealand Jewish Council slammed the Maori academic for 'trivialising state sponsored genocide'.

During the New Zealand Wars of 1845-1872, which saw the Maori defended their tribal lands from British colonial forces, 20,000 Maori were killed while hundreds of thousands more were driven from their homes.

The debate on national identity was part of a special broadcast on Waitangi Day - the holiday that marks the signing of the first treaty between representatives of the British Crown and Māori chiefs in 1840.

The document has always been disputed because the English and Māori versions of the treaty differed significantly. The British believed it gave it sovereignty over New Zealand and gave their appointed Governor the legal power to rule the country.

But Māori believed they ceded to the Crown a right of governance in return for protection, without giving up their authority to manage their own affairs.

Source

What is usually glided over is that it was Maori killing Maori that was the major cause of death after the British arrival. The Maori were vastly impressed by guns and gladly traded land for guns -- which they then used to kill off neighboring Maori tribes. It was in fact only British influence that eventually brought peace.

4 comments:

Brian from Rochester said...

Uh, unless I'm mistaken, the word holocaust is still an active word in the English language.

Could it be that he was saying the British rule was bad for the country, and just used the word holocaust to depict that bad time instead of referring to the Holocaust of WWII?

Anonymous said...

I'm with Brian.
Surely this story is really about certain elements of Jewry demanding special protection for their word - nothing can possibly be a holocaust or in any way likened to a holocaust except for the Jewish/Nazi one.
Even the gays/gypsys and others interred in concentration camps can't use it.
Since we are allowing people to claim ownership of words I call 'and' and 'the'. From now on people will have to pay me a licence fee to use these words. Whoo hoo $$$

Eddie Willers said...

Of course, what is also left unsaid is that the Maori are NOT the 'indigenous people' of NZ - they were simply the first to arrive and settle in large numbers around 1300AD.

What is also left unsaid is the fact that the Maori were a bloodthirsty lot who killed off the rival Moriori tribe on the Chatham Islands.

Anonymous said...

Isn't the WWII Holocaust normally presented with the capital H? So if this guy used it in the context indicated he would have been simply using it as a descriptor, not a proper noun. So this whole argument is about...capitalization?

Next topic please...