Thursday, February 18, 2010



End near for Fighting Sioux mascot?

We read:
"The end of the Fighting Sioux could be near as the University of North Dakota appears ready to abandon its mascot over calls of racism despite a petition drive by local tribe members to preserve the school's nickname and logo.

Supporters from the Standing Rock Sioux want to collect at least 600 signatures before the next tribal council meeting in March. "We just want the people to have their say," said Archie D. Fool Bear, one of the petition organizers. "It's not up to 17 people on the [tribal] council, it's up to the entire reservation to decide. A whole lot of people have told us, 'Get that petition going, we'll sign it.'"

Time, however, is running out. The North Dakota University System board could rid itself of the controversy by retiring the nickname and logo as early as Thursday's February meeting. Last month, both UND's Chancellor Bill Goetz and UND President Robert Kelley abandoned their neutral stances on the issue by coming out against keeping the Fighting Sioux nickname.

Under NCAA rules, universities may keep their Indian mascots, nicknames and logos as long as they receive the permission of the namesake tribe, which in UND's case consists of two tribes — the Spirit Lake Sioux and Standing Rock Sioux. The Spirit Lake Sioux tribal council gave its blessing in September but Standing Rock Sioux leaders have long opposed the nickname. That changed in October, when the tribe elected a new chairman and several new council members who favor the nickname, but a formal granting of permission has been slow to come.

The limbo leaves the University of North Dakota as the last campus with an unresolved Indian nickname. In 2005, the NCAA issued its decision against Indian nicknames and since then the rest of the 19 schools on its list either switched mascots or received tribal permission, said NCAA officials.

Source

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Political Correctness knows no bounds!

Anonymous said...

Just settle it the old fashioned way and have the two tribes fight it out and the winner decides?

Anonymous said...

I think the Sioux would be doing themselves a great service by leaving the names in place. It seems that only a few hardliners were the cause of the problem, but now they're gone. Hopefully this means that the matter will be settled in short order, and the truly great Sioux nation can get back to dealing with far more important issues.

Anonymous said...

Bobby, do you know who it was that introduced "scalping" to the West?

Clue: they didn't wear feathers...

Anonymous said...

Doesn't this all seem rather fickle?
What if the present council okays it - then next year a new council is elected who oppose it. Then the year after that, new council who ok it - and so it goes...
I think it's a good name and mascot and a tribute to the noble Sioux who inspired it.

Anonymous said...

Next up, the Denver Broncos will be changing their name as to not offend horses, also on the list for name Changes, the Cowboys, Redskins, Chiefs, Rams, Cardinals, basically all of them, because somewhere out there, someone is offended.

Anonymous said...

Anon 7:09 PM, it sounds a LOT like the current U.S. government. First gay marriage is illegal. Then it's legal. Then it's repealed so it's illegal. Then it's legislated back again to be legal. Then it's voted down by the people making it illegal. Then the courts reverse it and it's legal again. Then it goes back to legislation where it's illegal once more.

Where does it end?

Anonymous said...

It's called democracy - inevitably a struggle of wills!

Anonymous said...

Denver is the Mile High City.