Thursday, July 16, 2009



Google blocks blog exposing homosexual agenda

We read:
"Google's blog hosting service, Blogger.com, admits that in the name of "free speech" some of its blogs are "offensive, harmful, inaccurate," but when one of its clients blogged in opposition to a transgender rights bill, Google drew the line.

A day before the Massachusetts Legislature plans to review a controversial gender identity bill, Blogger.com blocked the blog of MassResistance, an organization that exposes the increasingly open agenda of the homosexual movement in Massachusetts, with a warning that some of the content may be "objectionable," requiring readers to confirm their intent to visit.

"Some readers of this blog have contacted Google because they believe this blog's content is objectionable," the warning reads. "In general, Google does not review nor do we endorse the content of this or any blog. For more information about our content policies, please visit the Blogger Terms of Service."

MassResistance blogger Amy Contrada, however, writes that the only potentially "objectionable" items on the blog are photos taken in public settings and her group's politically incorrect viewpoints. "We publish only facts, 'uncomfortable truths,' not rumors or personal attacks," Contrada writes on her blog. "And obviously, our photos reveal the ugly truth. Then, we identify those public figures who are twisting the law to enable public perversion and subversion of our youth and culture.".... "Nothing on our site could be construed as 'hate,'" Camenker said.

Source

6 comments:

Stan B said...

This is typical in "user monitored" systems. The extremists (on either side, but most apparently the left) claim the other side is guilty of "hate" and flag the blogs.

Google, not wanting to honk off the most vocal groups, hides behind its "hands off" policy.

Anonymous said...

It is not blocked. You can still choose to go to enter the site.

Anonymous said...

Once again, popular speach needs no protection. The fact that the site's content was objectionable to some is evidence that it is protected by the second ammendment.

Anonymous said...

"Nothing on our site could be construed as 'hate,"

Maybe not, but to those on the left, truth is far worse than hate.

Anonymous said...

To the right, truth is made up.

Anonymous said...

Since Google is so conscientious about removing anything someone finds objectionable, they might as well shut off all their computers since someone somewhere will find nearly everything objectionable. I hope they hurry to shut down all the Islamic sites spouting hate, but I'm not going to hold my breath.