Tuesday, September 21, 2021
Calling women 'birds' is 'plainly sexist', British judge rules
Calling women 'birds' is 'plainly sexist' and it is 'foolish' to use the term even jokingly, a judge has ruled.
Judge John Crosfill said using the phrase ironically at work in an attempt at humour is 'misplaced'.
The ruling came in the case of a Barclays investment banker who won a sex discrimination claim after her boss repeatedly called women 'birds'.
Anca Lacatus said James Kinghorn continued to use the term even after she told him to stop as he was trying to make her feel uncomfortable, a tribunal heard.
Mr Kinghorn defended his use of the word by saying he was being light-hearted but the tribunal ruled the term is 'plainly sexist,' and it was 'foolish' to think anyone would find it funny.
The East London tribunal heard that Ms Lacatus would have been reluctant to complain about her boss's sexist language out of fear it would have been damaging to her career.
She is now set to receive compensation for his treatment of her.
The Romanian worked as a £46,000 a year analyst for Barclays in what was her first job in investment banking after completing an Investments and Finance master's as Queen Mary University in London.
In a statement, Ms Lacatus said her boss Mr Kinghorn referred to a female employee as a 'bird' in February 2018.
She said that she immediately told him off for using the phrase but he then continued to say it in an effort to make her feel uncomfortable.
***************************************
Mother's fury at explicit school book with sexual details she ‘had to Google’
A US mother took a school board meeting by surprise when she took to the podium to share her anger at discovering a library book that described anal sex.
The outraged woman, identified as Kara Bell, took to the lectern last Wednesday to read out a racy extract from the book “Out of Darkness” leading school officials to cut her microphone.
The furious Texas mum told the Lake Travis Independent School District board that she had plans to discuss the need for a second high school but instead spoke about the sexually explicit book in two schools’ libraries, The Sun reports.
Bell read out the passage from the book, written by Ashley Hope Perez, where it depicted “cornholing” which she said she later found out was another term for anal sex.
“Not going to lie, I had to Google ‘cornhole’ because I have the game in the back of my yard,” Bell said. “But according to Wikipedia, ‘cornhole’ is a sexual slang vulgarism for anus.”
The board meeting, which was streamed online, then hears Bell complain that she doesn’t want her children to learn about “anal sex” in middle school. “I’ve never had anal sex,” she continued. “I don’t want to have anal sex. “I don’t want my kids having anal sex. I want you to start focusing on education and not public health.”
Her microphone was then cut off but that didn’t stop the mum from demanding the removal of the book.
The following day, local media reported that the school had removed the book from the library.
“A district possesses significant discretion to determine the content of its school libraries,” a spokesperson for the district told the news station.
***********************************
My other blogs. Main ones below:
http://edwatch.blogspot.com (EDUCATION WATCH)
http://dissectleft.blogspot.com (DISSECTING LEFTISM)
http://antigreen.blogspot.com (GREENIE WATCH)
http://pcwatch.blogspot.com (POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WATCH)
http://australian-politics.blogspot.com/ (AUSTRALIAN POLITICS)
http://awesternheart.blogspot.com.au/ (THE PSYCHOLOGIST)
https://heofen.blogspot.com/ (MY OTHER BLOGS)
*******************************
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment