Friday, May 15, 2020


Judge in Transgender Athlete Case Dictates Use of Politically Correct Language

A federal judge in a high-profile Title IX case has ordered lawyers representing three girls track stars to refer to two biological males who outraced them as “transgender females.”

The lawyers from Alliance Defending Freedom who represent the three high school girls filed a motion Friday arguing that the judge should recuse himself because he has shown that he is unable to be impartial.

Selina Soule, Alanna Smith, and Chelsea Mitchell argue in the case that being forced to compete with biological males who identify as girls poses significant, unfair physiological advantages to them.

District Judge Robert Chatigny’s insistence that the three girls’ lawyers use specific language that all but endorses the other side in the case prejudges those who maintain that Title IX protections shouldn’t be extended to those who “identify” as girls or women.

During a hearing conducted via telephone April 16, Chatigny ordered lawyers for the three girls “not to refer to the intervenors as ‘males’ but instead as ‘transgender females.’”

The judge said that the lawyers would not “surrender any legitimate interest or position if you refer to them as transgender females” and that the order was “consistent with science, common practice, and perhaps human decency.”

The three girls, all excellent athletes, began to lose events after two biological males who identify as girls began to compete against them, as CIAC policy allows. Alliance Defending Freedom and the girls it represents claim the policy contradicts Title IX’s intended purpose, which was to create equal opportunities for girls and women in education and sports.

SOURCE  

4 comments:

ScienceABC123 said...

Translation: It's a "show trial." The judge has already indicated how he's going to rule.

Anonymous said...

the order was “consistent with science"

What the hell? What science is that?

Anonymous said...

People with twisted minds should not be accommodated !

Anonymous said...

Translation: It's a "show trial." The judge has already indicated how he's going to rule.

Exactly. The issue before the court is whether the athletes are boy or girls when it comes to sport.

For a judge to basically decide the issue, demanding that the people at the center of the controversy be declared "females" is deciding the case before the actual trial even begins.