Wednesday, May 18, 2016



Leftist Hate speech Hoax now admitted

The Texas man who sued Whole Foods Market for allegedly writing an anti-gay slur on his cake has admitted that it was a hoax. Jordan Brown dropped his lawsuit against Whole Foods and has now apologized.

Brown alleged that he went to Whole Foods Market and bought a cake and had a bakery associate write “Love Wins” on it. He then claimed the associate wrote a homophobic slur instead.

From Fox News:

The Texas pastor who sued Whole Foods in April for allegedly writing a gay slur on a cake he bought withdrew his lawsuit on Monday and apologized to the supermarket chain for perpetrating a hoax, KVUE reported.

"The company did nothing wrong," openly gay pastor Jordan Brown wrote in a Monday statement. "I was wrong to pursue this matter and use the media to perpetuate this story."

Brown said in April that he requested a cake from Whole Foods with the phrase “Love Wins” written on it, but when he received his cake there was a homophobic remark added. Brown made the accusation in an Internet video and launched a lawsuit shortly thereafter.

But alert viewers quickly pointed out that the icing style used to write “Love Wins” and the gay slur appeared to differ, and Whole Foods released surveillance video showing the cake being purchased with the UPC code in a different location than Brown's video, suggesting the cake had been opened and tampered with.

The baker who sold Brown the cake is gay. A subsequent internal Whole Foods investigation cleared him of the allegations.

Brown did say why made up the story. Whole Foods has countersued Brown and there’s no word if they have dropped their own countersuit.

Hopefully, Whole Foods continues its suit against Brown. There has to be a public example made of those who invent these types of hoaxes.

SOURCE 

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

There is something wrong with the minds of homosexuals !

Anonymous said...

I hope Whole Foods pushes their lawsuit far enough to cost this guy some money, at least force him to hire a lawyer for a few weeks. It's time the liberal/homosexual agenda felt a little push-back.

Use the Name, Luke said...

1:27, Whole Foods has released a statement saying that they would not pursue the counter-suit. I agree with you, they should. The problem is that they're actually on his side, so they were only defending themselves, not fighting for the truth.

Anonymous said...

The local DA should look into this attempt to commit fraud and extortion. Whole Foods shouldn't have to pursue it any further themselves. It is a criminal matter now, not a civil one.

Anonymous said...

1:08 What about the minds of religious "preachers", which was what that guy also was. The cocktail of religion and sex is very potent and disorientating (sorry for the offensive words "cock" and "potent").

Anonymous said...

All attempts of fraud and extortion should be prosecuted to the max regardless of their political views or sexual orientation. To do any less just encourages other losers to do the same.

Bird of Paradise said...

And in the middle east they take these rainbow boys and throw them off tall buildings and not a thing from the Useless Nations Human Rights Commision

Anonymous said...

If you remember, when this story first broke on this site, there were people who defended the pastor and said the writing could not have been faked.

Wonder where those people are now?

Anonymous said...

Bird of P - don't try to make one country seem better by a comparison with worse in the Mid-East (or their reps in the UN). Inhumane behavior of any degree is bad wherever it takes place. Are we in a race to the bottom?!

Anonymous said...

3:53 I don't think anybody here said the writing "could not have been faked" as a presumed fact, rather it was questioning the attitude of some posters here that it definitely WAS faked. Obviously nobody here was then in a position to know for certain one way or the other, and all was a matter of speculation, but so it was right to question some other people's mere assumptions/presumptions. Clearly it was contrived by somebody for whatever weird reason or motivation!

Use the Name, Luke said...

The pushback was against those who looked at the evidence and saw that it looked like a scam by claiming that they did not look at the evidence. Oh look! The evidence we looked at then corresponded with the reality! This is my surprised face: :-|

Anonymous said...

Oh look at Luke the remote detective!