Wednesday, February 17, 2016



Leftist students at Rutgers try to shut down speech they disagree with

While journalist Milo Yiannopoulos spoke about "the myth" of the wage gap and the pitfalls of feminism, student protestors in the audience at Scott Hall stood up and smeared fake blood on their faces in opposition.

About 50 students sat in the audience to protest Yiannopoulos's University visit, which kicked off his “Dangerous Faggot” tour. Yiannopoulos, senior editor at conservative news site breitbart.com, is known for his controversial statements about feminism, race and political correctness.

After screaming, “This man represents hatred,” an anonymous female student smeared what appeared to be blood over her face and arms. About 10 others soon followed, and then left the room together. Roughly 40 protestors stayed for the remainder of the event.

"We must, unlike the Left, engage in the other side of the argument," Yiannopoulos said. "I noticed that when they were asked questions, they left the room."

A number of shouting matches and profane exchanges between audience members occurred throughout the event. Some audience members responded to the protestors by chanting, "Trump."

SOURCE 

10 comments:

Stan B said...

I'm surprised the little egg-shells didn't demand a safe-space from such realities that they will encounter in life!

Anonymous said...

"What did you learn in college today, my precious child?"

"Mommy I learned how to put my fingers in my ears and shout real loud when someone says something I don't want to hear."

"Oh, aren't you mommy's wonderful, smart little baby."

Bird of Paradise said...

No good little snots in need of having mouths washed out then grounded for the rest of the year until summer Just proves the intollerence of these leftists scumbags

Anonymous said...

What is telling is that progressives cannot defend their views which make them only dogma. That is the same problem the catholic church has when denouncing homosexuality, the bible says it is wrong so it has to be which is also dogma. There are good arguments for and against homosexuality and all the related gender bending offshoots and those need to be what is debated, not just the dogma of each side.

MDH

Spurwing Plover the fighting shorebird said...

This just proves the intollrence of these little bolshevek scumballs to them free speech is old fashion and needs replaced with speech codes becuase they beleive the U.S. Constitution is old fashion and needs replaced with various United Nations Treaties

Use the Name, Luke said...

C'mon guys. Let's get our definitions right, here.

Hate speech: "The biological facts are…"

Not hate speech: "You [beep] [beep] [beeping] [beep] piece of [beep] racist [beep] [beep] bigoted [beep] conservative! [beep] [beep] and die!"

All will become clear once we simply accept modernized definitions!

Alpha Skua leader of the skuas said...

To liberal hate speech is any one singing the National Antheme becuase it offends whining little liberals pinheads

Flu-Bird said...

And maerican tax payers are paying those adminastrators way too much to indoctrinate these youths

Vlad the Shrike said...

Fifty maggot infested pieces of worm ridden filth try to keep some one from excersizing their 1st amendment rights they need their mouths washed out with soap

Storm the Albatross said...

The little brats need returned to their play pens to pout