I have known quite a few "old diggers" (elderly Australian Army veterans) in my day and I am pretty sure what most of them would say if asked whether they fought so that homosexuality would be promoted as normal. The reply would be cutting, very cutting. (Anzac day is when Australia remembers its troops fallen in war).
"The head of the Australian Christian Lobby says outrage over a claim that Australian soldiers didn't fight for gay marriage is down to "misinterpretation".
Earlier today ACL managing director Jim Wallace said on Twitter: "Just hope that as we remember Servicemen and women today we remember the Australia they fought for — wasn't gay marriage and Islamic!" The comment sparked widespread condemnation from other Twitter users, who said Mr Wallace should be "ashamed".
This afternoon Mr Wallace apologised "unreservedly" for having made the comment on Anzac Day and said the comment had been misinterpreted. "There is no way I was trying to infer that our veterans didn't fight for all Australians. Of course they did," Mr Wallace told news.com.au. "I spent 32 years in the army myself, I'm imbued with that. "I'm the last person to (want to) demean Anzac Day or our veterans."
However Mr Wallace stood by his belief that the "nature" of the country that veterans had fought for was changing. "I was simply there with my father, a 96-year-old veteran of Tobruk and Milne Bay," Mr Wallace said. "And he was lamenting, as he had in the past, that he found it difficult to identify the Australia that he fought for. "I think that the nature of our society that our soldiers fought for was based on Judeo-Christian heritage."
SOURCE
Australia has civil unions for homosexuals but both major parties oppose homosexual marriage so no Australian State has it. So Mr Wallace was probably more defensive than he needed to be. He is in fact mainstream in Australia. The homosexual-supporters are just more shrill.
5 comments:
In spite of the fact that the overwhelming majorities of most countries (and most religions) are against homosexuals and homsexual marriage, the radical gay activists will not stop. And as usual, what they can't get at the ballot box, they try to get from some gay judge they find somewhere, usually out in Mexifornia. But don't think for one moment that they'll stop trying.
What they want is to be deemed a "special class" of citizen, with special rights, privileges, and protections beyond those enjoyed by others, even more than they have now. And they want it done via congressional legislation and/or court mandate.
Wallace should apologise for nothing. It is disappointing that he did, and suggests he may no longer be fit for leadership. 'Gay' rights are closely allied with 'multiculturalism'. Did Australian soldiers wittingly fight for the "agenda", which appears to include the engineered and purposeful destruction of all peoples, their heritage and memory so as that the new raceless masses may be more easily herded by a world parliament into their corrals ?
They did not, and would not have, if they knew. If keeping the people broadly and mutually respectfully separate circumvents the works of evil, ritually self abusive pricks who covet power and position, then we should support the concept.
Advocacy of homosexuality in schools has no place in schools. How does one undo what cannot be undone should innocents decide to 'experiment' with that which thousands of generations of parents have discarded as being of no use or value to their children's personal futures ?
Some things cannot be undone, and the pain of having participated sustains and energises the pushers of it, especially when it is inflicted on innocents...
In this regard, it is correctly identified as a form of predatory paedophilia that preys on innocents, by proxy and protected by the legal mechanisms of government.
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/german-government-publication-promotes-incestuous-pedophilia-as-healthy-sex
Wait for the liberal UN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITY they will have him tried for a hate crime
How does anything get changed without "activists" and "militants" even in a so-called democracy - eg. suffragettes (for women's votes), abolitionists (against slavery), or even the American Revolution for independence!! - all of those were very "activist" !!
The UN was never created for peace its only there for world goverment
Post a Comment