Saturday, January 15, 2011

More instances of Leftist hate speech

An editorial in Monday’s New York Times justified the focus on conservatives: “It is legitimate to hold Republicans and particularly their most virulent supporters in the media responsible for the gale of anger that has produced the vast majority of these threats, setting the nation on edge.” But while the liberal media indict Palin and other conservatives, there’s a long list of vicious rhetoric coming from media liberals.

MSNBC has been the most venomous, a fact NBC has glossed over in its coverage castigating conservatives. The network’s 8pm ET host Keith Olbermann in 2009 referred to columnist Michelle Malkin as “a big mashed-up bag of meat with lipstick on it.” Hardball’s Chris Matthews fantasized about the death of Rush Limbaugh: “Somebody’s going to jam a CO2 pellet into his head and he’s going to explode like a giant blimp.”

The outrage evidenced this week was not to be found when a film festival showed “Death of a President,” a movie depicting the imagined assassination of President Bush. “Poor taste or, as some say, thought-provoking?” MSNBC daytime anchor Amy Robach mildly wondered on September 1, 2006.

On Monday’s The Ed Show, MSNBC’s 6pm ET host Ed Schultz pointed his finger at Fox News for supposedly inciting its audience to “think that doing something radical is the right thing to do,” but sidestepped his own history of shocking comments. “I get passionate, but not in a violent way,” Schultz insisted.

On his national radio show in 2009, however, Schultz wished for Dick Cheney’s death: “He is an enemy of the country, in my opinion, Dick Cheney is, he is an enemy of the country....Lord, take him to the Promised Land, will you?” (MP3 audio) In 2010, Schultz screamed that “Dick Cheney’s heart’s a political football. We ought to rip it out and kick it around and stuff it back in him!” (MP3 audio)

Other left-wing radio hosts have openly desired the death of leading conservatives without a peep from the liberal media elites. Radio host Mike Malloy (a onetime news writer for CNN) wished for Rush Limbaugh’s demise on January 4, 2010, a few days after the conservative host was hospitalized for chest pains: “I’m waiting for the day when I pick it up, pick up a newspaper or click on the Internet and find out he’s choked to death on his own throat fat or a great big wad of saliva or something, you know, whatever. Go away, Rush, you make me sick!” (MP3 audio)

In 2009, then-Air America radio host Montel Williams urged Congresswoman Michele Bachmann to kill herself: “Slit your wrist! Go ahead! I mean, you know, why not? I mean, if you want to — or, you know, do us all a better thing. Move that knife up about two feet. I mean, start right at the collarbone.” (MP3 audio)

If Bachmann had been the Congresswoman attacked this weekend instead of Giffords, would the media be as strong in their attacks of the overheated rhetoric lobbed against her over the past several years?

HBO’s Bill Maher, a favorite guest on CNN and other supposedly respectable news networks, wished for the deaths of both Limbaugh and Cheney. Talking about the then-Vice President in 2007, after al Qaeda exploded a truck bomb at a base in Afghanistan near where Cheney was visiting, Maher argued: “I’m just saying if he did die, other people, more people would live. That’s a fact.”

In 2008, Maher morbidly suggested Limbaugh would have been a better candidate to have died from a drug overdose: “Why couldn’t he have croaked from it instead of Heath Ledger?”

Among the claims this week is that anti-government rhetoric is putting public servants in peril. If such a dubious claim is true, MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann was jeopardizing lives when he teed off against the government’s anti-terrorism policies in 2006: “We now face what our ancestors faced at other times of exaggerated crisis and melodramatic fear-mongering: A government more dangerous to our liberty than is the enemy it claims to protect us from.”

Media gadfly Arianna Huffington made her own plea for civility, telling the Washington Post via e-mail this weekend that “there are lots of ways to be lively and put forth a strong opinion without demonizing one’s opponent....It’s the demonization that is the problem.”

But her Huffington Post blog site has demonized conservatives for years, including an item posted in early 2007 mocking the cancer that would eventually take the life of White House press secretary Tony Snow. Sneered San Francisco radio host Charles Karel Bouley: “I hear about Tony Snow and say to myself, well, stand up every day, lie to the American people at the behest of your dictator-esque boss and well, how could a cancer NOT grow in you. Work for Fox News, spinning the truth in to a billion knots and how can your gut not rot?”

The Left has been trying for years to shut down conservative radio and otherwise criminalize conservative speech. Using this tragedy to further that agenda is beyond cynical, and probably counterproductive: a new CBS News poll finds that even after a weekend of anti-conservative propaganda, 57% don’t think “harsh political rhetoric” had anything to do with the shootings.

But if the media insist on having a debate about political speech, they need to focus on the Left’s vileness as well. Otherwise, they’re just partisan hypocrites joining in the exploitation of tragedy for political gain.

SOURCE

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

The Left controls the media, so it will spin it to its favor. But the Right has many voices, and Americans are listening.

-sig

Spurwing Plover said...

Leave it to a completly worthless rag like the NEW YORK SLIMES to print such hogwash and poppycock i hope they soon file for chapter 11

Anonymous said...

One of the reasons the Left's message gets out is because they have an army of dupes and mindless cretins, like Anon 12:34. But that very army is also their weak link, since mindless dupes are always the weak link.

What we're seeing in the MSM is nothing new. Remember the two most fundamental principles of the Left.

1. Keep your enemies on the defensive using lies, rumor, distortion, and innuendo. People who defend themselves are always seen as being guilty in the court of public opinion. The politicizing of the AZ shooting by the Left is a perfect example.

2. Say and do the most vile and atrocious things, then simply blame them on your enemies. And, as we see, this is really easy when you control the media. Again, the perfect example is how the Left is using the AZ shooting for political advantage.

There is only one way to defeat the Left, and that is, by using their tactics. The problem with Conservatives is that, well, they're too conservative. All that does is give the Left yet another weapon to use.

Anonymous said...

"There is only one way to defeat the Left, and that is, by using their tactics."

You've finally figured that out? LOL.

Anonymous said...

Conservatives should not lower themselves to the left's standards - that makes us no better. It takes longer, but the truth will rule, as can be seen with the turn-around and the majority fed up with their 'creative reporting'.

TheOldMan said...

Folks, it's very easy to use NAME/URL instead of Anonymous. That makes it easier to connect comments to the same user.

Use the Name, Luke said...

That makes it easier to connect comments to the same user.

Which is why the trolls and leftists (but I repeat myself) refuse to do so.

Stucco Holmes said...

"Which is why the trolls and leftists (but I repeat myself) refuse to do so."

How do you know? Do you what is in their heads (and don't say nothing)? You lump all trolls and leftists in one big pile? There may be good reason to stay anonymous. "Use the Name, Luke" is just as anonymous as any other. Do you accept email through that handle? No. You want to stay anonymous, just with a cutsie name.

Use the Name, Luke said...

How do you know?

It's called experience. I've seen trolls right on this blog deliberately playing "who said what" games by hiding behind "Anonymous."

Though a handle does not directly connect to a particular person, it is still useful in distinguishing on person from another and following an argument from beginning to end.

We The People said...

Anonymous 4:08 said...
"Conservatives should not lower themselves to the left's standards - that makes us no better."

We did hold ourselves to a higher standard. It was called the Silent Majority. Remember? And while we were silent all those years, the left grew stronger because there was no one to stop them. We were all too busy being nice. Take a look at the shape our country is in and tell me if being nice is worth it. And don't bother telling me that it's ok now that Republicans finally got the House back. They're not much better than the Dems except they're a lot weaker.