Wednesday, May 08, 2019
Criticizing Australia
Under the heading "What the fear of 'getting Yassmin-ed' says about free speech and racism in Australia", there is a long article by Pakistani writer Sami Shah which says that recent immigrants to Australia risk a lot of abuse if they criticize Australia. To him that is proof of racism.
It is nothing of the sort. For at least the whole of the 20th century and beyond Australians have been angered by criticism of their country. And that criticism mostly came from English immigrants -- birthing the epithet "Whingeing Pom".
Since both those terms are little known outside Australia I guess I should explain: A "Pom" is an English person and whingeing is the sort of complaining vocalization you get from an overtired baby. The expression is in other words a very derogatory term for an English person who criticizes Australia. And the English are THE SAME RACE as old Australians. So it is hardly racist.
The sensitivity to criticism arose from the unceasing flow of English-born immigrants to Australia. When things are done differently in Australia, Poms tend to assume and say that the Australian way is inferior. After hearing such claims many times Australians lose patience with that and tend to ask the "Pom" why he doesn't go back to England. Which normally leads to a backtrack.
So the hostility to criticism that Mr Shah describes is due to the criticisms, not the speaker. It is not unique to any ethnic group. Mr Shah simply does not know his ethnography. Treading on toes will get you a counterblast no matter who you are.
Yassmin Abdel-Magied was particularly insulting. She insulted Australia's war-dead, the sort of thing which many people worldwide would find unforgiveable. She too did not know her ethnography.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Listen to the whining of a the Liberal Snowflake(Snivelous Whinus)always looking for something that offends them get it removed
It appears to me that the sort of people who would leave their home country and seek a new life on the other side of the world are likely to be biased towards two different psychological profiles: the adventurers and the malcontents. The first group disappear into their new country seamlessly, and you hear nothing about them until, decades later, it is noticed that the local captain of industry has a funny accent. The second group fit into their new country no better than in their own, and they spend their time whinging. It used to be the Poms who were known for whinging, but since then the scope has broadened.
When I mentioned this to the son of an Italian immigrant, he agreed, and commented that the second group has a tendency to squirrel their way into various ex-pat organisations, where they make a nuisance of themselves.
Post a Comment