Monday, August 30, 2010



Tax as a way of silencing critics

We read:
"Philadelphia is going after a popular method for citizens to express their discontent with government: blogs. The rulers of the City of Brotherly Love have not outlawed blogs; rather they are using what the nation’s fourth chief justice, John Marshall, called the “power to destroy”: taxation.

The city government is demanding that some bloggers pay $300 for a licensing fee and then pay taxes on all profits. Of course, most bloggers don’t make any money; their posting is informal and irregular. That, however, does not matter to Philadelphia officials.

For all of the revenue talk, however, I suspect there is a more important reason for this new government outrage: intimidation of anyone who would use a blog to criticize government officials. The connection is easy to make. Bloggers in Philadelphia who might utter words of dissent against the city’s ruling class would make themselves visible, especially if the comments took hold with a larger audience. Thus city officials would be able to access the records to see if the blogger had paid for a business license. If not, the rogue would be brought to justice.

This past year I used one of my blogs to write on the trial of Tonya Craft and its aftermath in northwest Georgia, and I admittedly took no prisoners. I reported on obvious instances of alleged perjury from prosecution witnesses and pointed out huge inconsistencies in the prosecutorial evidence.

Obviously, I did not earn friends on the prosecution side, and I am sure the prosecutors and judge would have loved to have shut down my blog, especially since the jury acquitted Craft. (Three days after the verdict the district attorney declared that the blogosphere “created an environment hostile to the State’s ability to receive a fair trial.”)

In this day of governments grasping for revenues, it is not surprising to see Philadelphia trying to milk the bloggers. I suspect other cities will follow suit. However, I believe that the larger issue is that governments once again are looking for any means to silence their detractors. Entities with the power to tax their critics also have the weapons to destroy them.

Source

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Big Brother is watching, johnjay.

So be careful what you say.

Remember (sometimes) it's better to run away,

And live to fight (or blog) another day.


bogsidebunny

Anonymous said...

What are they going to do about the people who live across the river in New Jersey? Can't tax them!

Anonymous said...

Anon 9:20 PM, if New Jersey adopts similar legislation, then New Jersey certainly will.

Anonymous said...

If the city were going after all bloggers and forcing them to have some sort of license, there would be a strong case for saying the law is a form of censorship.

As it is, the law only goes after blogs that are making money. Just as any business (that is out to make money) is required to have a license, the city is saying that money making blogs are no different.

If you don't want to pay the fee, don't make money off of your blog.

Anonymous said...

Anon 203, what city resources are being used in the creation of a for-profit blog? Does the city levy a tax on published authors of written works there?

Anonymous said...

Does the city levy a tax on published authors of written works there?

If the author is paid for their works, yes.

Anonymous said...

Use an address outside the city to get paid for your blog, or team up with an administrator that has a outside city address. Good luck in attempting to tax someone for comments about their city who do not live there.