Muslim hate crimes must be appeased
Contrast this story with the one above. This was an actual hate crime, not a joke. The guys below have apparently been offered community service as the only penalty -- and in San Francisco at that. Christians would have been locked up for good. Note that the overwhelming motivation of the prosecutiors seems to be to get an "agreement" with the offenders!
"Three Hayward men accused of shooting a San Francisco man they thought was gay with a BB gun in February delayed entering pleas Thursday, and prosecutors indicated that talks are under way to settle the case.
Shafiq Hashemi, 21, Mohammad Habibzada, 24, and Sayed Bassam, 21, are accused of shooting a 27-year-old man from their car at 16th and Guerrero streets in the Mission District on Feb. 26, then driving off. The man was hit in the cheek but not seriously injured.
Police arrested the three nearby and they allegedly confessed that they had come to San Francisco to shoot gay people, according to police.
Prosecutors have charged them with assault with a deadly weapon, negligent discharge of a firearm, hate crimes and attempted mayhem.
Judge Bruce Chan ordered entry of plea delayed until April 19 "to see if there can be some resolution that would meet all the interests of the communities and parties involved." "We've communicated an offer to the defendants, and they're considering it," prosecutor Victor Hwang said after the hearing.
According to Hwang, community service may be part of the settlement, though the final details of the possible plea deal are still being discussed.
Source
13 comments:
I'll bet if they knew they would get away with it, they would've used a shotgun! You would think that this being San Francisco, where just about everybody is gay, we'd see massive protests by radical gay activists. Hmm...
BTW, a BB gun is not a 'fire'arm since it requires no gunpowder to function.
You can kill with a BB gun, provided the pellet enters the victim's eyes.
I wonder how the gay community feels that it's open season on them unless the person shooting is a Christian. Here it is, the perfect defense,"I shot the gay man because I'm a Muslim. Now let me go free and give me back my gun." "Oh, could someone please point me in the direction of the Gay Pride Parade?"
So the courts there have sent Muslims the message that they can begin hunting gays with little consequence to themselves?
SF, you are about to learn a very hard lesson.
A hard lesson? It's about time!
Bobby, just how many people have you heard of being killed by a BB gun? You really need to get out more.
"Bobby, just how many people have you heard of being killed by a BB gun?"
---You watch the TV show "A thousand ways to die?" You'd be surprised at the way some people meet their maker.
In fact, here's a story of a 6 year old killed by this weapon.
http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/15742945/detail.html
Either way, the three Muslims should do jail time and face hate crime charges just like anyone else would.
Hopefully this will wake the gays up about the threat of radical Islam.
"Bobby, just how many people have you heard of being killed by a BB gun?"
---You watch the TV show "A thousand ways to die?" You'd be surprised at the way some people meet their maker.
In fact, here's a story of a 6 year old killed by this weapon.
http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/15742945/detail.html
Either way, the three Muslims should do jail time and face hate crime charges just like anyone else would.
Hopefully this will wake the gays up about the threat of radical Islam.
Talk about pandering to the Muslims. The brits have caved in big time!
Story site: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article7094311.ece
SCOTLAND YARD (Metropolitan Police in London) has bowed to Islamic sensitivities and accepted that Muslims are entitled to throw shoes in ritual protest — which could have the unintended consequence of politicians or the police being hit.
News of the concession by the Metropolitan police has come to light amid a series of trials of more than 70 mostly Muslim demonstrators who were charged with violent disorder after last year’s Gaza protests outside the Israeli embassy in London.
Aquib Salim, 21, an IT student at Queen Mary, London University, who was involved in a shoe-throwing incident, is almost certain to avoid a prison sentence as a result.
Bobby said...
"You watch the TV show "A thousand ways to die?" You'd be surprised at the way some people meet their maker."
I'm not surprised to see you furnish such a scientific explanation. So, according to you and your TV shows, "anything and everything" is a firearm. One can stab someone in the eye with a pencil. Is that also a firearm? How about poking a finger in someones eye. Is your finger a firearm?
You should spend less time in the hot Florida sun.
I did not use the word "firearm," I used the word "weapon." And yes, a "weapon" can be almost anything: an icepick, a screwdriver, a baseball bat, a BB gun, etc, can be used as as weapon. This is why gun control laws are stupid, because they try to inanimate objects.
Now tell me, do you think it's perfectly fine to shoot strangers with a BB gun?
"Some commercial airguns (including BB and/or pellet guns) have the ability to fire considerably faster, even beyond 550 ft/s (170 m/s). Although claims are often exaggerated, a few airguns can actually fire a standard 0.177 lead pellet faster than 1000 ft/s (about 680 miles per hour), but these are generally not BB firing guns."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BB_gun#Safety
Muslims are always asking for special rights, in England for example they are disobeying NHS rules.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/7576357/Muslim-staff-escape-NHS-hygiene-rule.html
Assault with a deadly weapon is the act of menacing another person with a weapon that could cause death. A BB gun is highly unlikely to cause death, just like a paintball gun is unlikely to cause death. If it were an air rifle, rather than a classic red rider type bb gun, designed to fire pellets a case /might/ be made that it is a deadly weapon. Discharge of a firearm is right out; there is no way they can get that charge to stick. Hate crimes, yes, unless that is a charge you are willing to walk to the Supreme Court. Attempted mayhem, yes. I doubt any reasonable person is in disagreement that harsher penalties would have been sought if the religion of the perpetrators had been Midwestern style Protestant.
I agree that this isn't assault with a deadly weapon, however, community service is not the right sentence for this kind of crime.
Take Paris Hilton, she was sentenced to 45 days for violating probation in an alcohol-related reckless driving case, after 3 days in jail she was put on house arrest for medical reasons.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=10819127
So, if a powerful celebrity with plenty of money and top of the line attorneys can do 3 days in jail for an non-violent offence, I would think three muslims who did engaged in violence, who commited a hate crime according to the law, should do more than community service.
Amusing to watch?! Oh yes - let the muslims' greater aggression defeat the gays - and then what? - YOU are next in line! Good Luck! Instead, don't you have some common cause with your compatriot gays, and have at least some greater opposition to the muslim hoards?
Post a Comment