Tuesday, March 05, 2019
Freedom to ERASE speech at Kentucky U?
When Thomas Smith decided to call UKPD, the damage had already been done.
An outraged student had poured water on anti-abortion chalk drawings written on a sidewalk leading up to the Gatton Student Center. Smith, a member of the Pro-Life Wildcats, the group that made the anti-abortion chalk drawings, felt that the student was violating their right to free expression on campus.
Lidya Azad, the student later identified as the one tossing water, felt that she was expressing her right to free speech by pouring water on the chalked sidewalk.
In a video provided to the Kernel, Azad poured more water on the chalk drawings.
“If it’s your free speech to do this,” Azad said in the video, referring to the chalk, “then it’s also my free speech to do this,” she said as she poured more water onto the politically tinged sidewalk.
According to the UK Student Code of Conduct, students have “the right to engage in discussion, to exchange thought and opinion, to speak, write, or print freely on any subject…”
UKPD officers were present on the scene after the Pro-Life Wildcats called them. They also filed a report with police, but the outcome of that report is not known.
Azad sent a statement to the Kernel after the event, saying she feels it is her duty to defend her freedom and fight for marginalized groups.
The group applied for and received a permit for chalking from John Herbst, Executive Director of the Gatton Student Center, said UK spokesperson Jay Blanton.
Most university areas are open for the use of free speech areas with the exception of areas that impede traffic to classrooms or high-traffic walkways, he said. “Generally speaking, most areas of campus are open with respect to free speech,” Blanton said.
SOURCE
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
In this one I am going to accept that she had the right to express herself by pouring that water on the chalk markings and I despise abortion. Had those drawings been on a different media than a walk the story would be different but sometimes you simply have to understand that the location chosen can make a difference.
5:02: On the other hand, erasing those comments is the same as preventing unwanted speech from being heard. It isn't part of a discussion, it is preventing further discussion.
The temporary nature of the media does have interesting connotations.
However, little is truly permanent. Paper degrades, cardboard perishes, even marble statues eventually decay and are broken.
If it is impermissible to tear down a poster, is this really any different?
The response to the chalk messages should have been competing messages - not destruction IMHO.
Post a Comment