Friday, September 02, 2016




Some Warmist hate speech

Steven Craig Jones wants to save the planet.  He has a site that says so here: pulsar774.tripod.com

So how does he deal with skeptics?  He sent Marc Morano the following message:

"you are dead wrong on climate change.  it is the number one international security issue on planet earth in 2016. you climate deniers need to be put in prison"

He's all charm, isn't he?  He makes no attempt to dispute any point ever made by any skeptic and makes no attempt to present any fact. Since he believes in anti-gravity that is perhaps just as well.  All he can resort to is Stalinism:  Imprison your opponents. A dismal soul, indeed. He is completely dogmatic, with a completely closed mind.  It might not be good to see him coming towards you on a dark night if you disagree with him.

The fantasy of being able to save the planet must generate such a warm glow inside.  No wonder he hates any threat to that.  How awful to find that you are in fact completely irrelevant and that your crusade has been a complete waste of time!  The poor dupe.

His email is calisunnerz@gmail.com


19 comments:

Bird of Paradise said...

Just another gaia worshiping granola bar munching,tree hugging bike riding eco-freak he sounds as bad as R.I. Sheldon Whitehouse who want to persicute skeptics and John Kerry who thinks Air Conditioners are more dangerous then the ISIS and the rest of the Global Warming crowd of idiots

Anonymous said...

In August 2016, A story appeared on CNN about the magazine, "The Old Farmer's Almanac." In that story we find the following: "Dave Hennen, senior meteorologist and executive producer for CNN Weather, says it (the Old Farmer's Almanac's predictions) should be taken with a grain of salt -- and not necessarily road salt.
"It's difficult enough to do a five-day forecast," he said. "We're really good at the day of and the next day, (and) we're better at temperature a ways out than precipitation. But to forecast out that far in advance ... even the science behind our long-range forecasting is sometimes not that solid."
So, if the Senior meteorologist for CNN says making predictions for something that will happen months down the road is not solid, why should we believe "global warming" predictions for years down the road are any better? I believe in climate change. It is indisputable that over time the climate fluctuates, but to place all the blame for that change on humans I cannot and will not accept.

AIB/44

Anonymous said...

Typical Leftist. They don't debate facts, just insult and persecute you if you do not accept what they say as true.

Chris Hoey said...

It was his kind of thinking that led the Catholic Church to excommunicate Galileo. At the time the scientific community soundly rejected his heliocentric system theory. The Church went with the scientists, and got a blot on its record for its mistake.

Spurwing Plover said...

Have you seen the stupid illistration for the Washington Post? it shows who dumb human type figures the man figure is frowning and has a nucular power plant and smoking factory smoke stacks the womans shoes a dumb bicycle,a dumb solar pannel a dumb recycle handbag a tree and flower Its just more proof that enviromentalisms a new age insanity cuase by too many granola bars and watching A INCONVENT TRUTH

Olaf Koenders said...

Sounds like the kind of panic-stricken f-wit that bars up his doors and windows to stop dangerous climate change getting in during the night.

Anonymous said...

I think this post is poor form JJR.
It appears spiteful, unnecessarily personal, and seems to be an attempt to recruit users of this site into a personal vendetta by posting his email.

Gooniebird said...

Racial Carson lied about DDT Al Gore lied about Global Warming Paul Ehrlich lied about Over Population the Enviromentalists have lied about the Rainforests air and water Polution and their still lying and the EDF puts out fales and misleading commercials about Global Warming

Anonymous said...

If you mothertrumpers hate science so much, why are you using a science-packed computer to post your idiotic messages?

Anonymous said...

Anon 2:42,

That may be one of the dumbest comments I have ever read.

No one "hates" science. In fact, what the cause of AGW advocates is anything but science. That's the point. While warmists say things like "the consensus is...." the fact of the matter is that consensus has nothing to do with science. Consensus is opinion, not science.

When data gets lost so the studies cannot be reviewed, when the models don't fit real world observations, when the data is changed, etc, none of that is science. (It should be remembered that the IPCC reports are ripe with science failures.)

Finally, science welcomes discussion of topics. People and even scientists are free to dismiss points of contention, but the conversation itself is always welcome. Contrast that to "we need to arrest people who disagree with AGW."

Warmists have a problem in that their position are not scientific and are designed to increase governmental authority as well as redistribute massive amounts of wealth.

However, if you want to make the stupid statement that people who comment here are anti science and yet using computers, the opposite is that you are on a computer, driving a car, sitting in AC, etc, all of which take generated electricity which, according to warmists, adds to AGW.

In other words, you go first. Put you actions where your mouth is.

Anonymous said...

Perhaps 2:42 AM should try some pharmacological science and take some Valium before his brain short circuits, permanently. The froth on your keyboard should be taken as a warning sign.

Olaf Koenders said...

Yep.. 2:42 AM should lead the way and go back to a cave somewhere that a forward-thinking Australopithecus abandoned long ago for the comforts of science-backed, modern-day living. Take your friends of the Earth with you. I'm sure you'll be able to dig up some ancient man-made tools under a retreating glacier, as has already been done.

Meanwhile, the rest of us will be trying to repair the atmosphere to 4000ppm CO2 where it used to be, as it was highly productive for plants, and not a runaway greenhouse ever.

Anonymous said...

Repair the atmosphere? Now that's rich. Wonder what color the atmosphere is in your fantasy world of omnipotent man.

You've fallen for the biggest snow job in the history of mankind. Let the government fix what's not broken all the while enriching themselves and their cronies. Impoverish everyone else. Hey, no problem. Ask yourself why your saviors are always jetting off to a climate conference in some exotic locale. Wouldn't a video conference be better? Well then they couldn't enjoy a nice vacation on our dime that's why.

Wake up and smell the methane of your own bs.

Anonymous said...

Without honest discussion the AGW supporters calling for criminal punishment for denial of mans supposed causation of global warming is akin to the action of the NAZI's. I don't make such a statement lightly but people need to realise that public hysteria driven by leftist agitators does not constitute science. Telling people that they can't challenge the opinions of those who have decided that man is responsible for all their supposed climate claims is ridiculous. Those that deny any possibility of man not being totally responsible for the changing climate seriously should be assessed as to their mental health as they deny the right to other people to think freely and question what they have been told to accept. Call me a skeptic but I do believe there is a movement to instill a global government and AGW is a major part of it. Look to George Soros for a start and follow the trail to Silicon Valley along with the Clintons. Don't believe me? Do your own homework and prove me wrong.

Anonymous said...

You trumping assholes pick and choose what science fits within your demented view of the world. Natural selection will make you and your ilk extinct. The sooner, the better.

Anonymous said...

Anon 5:46,

People like you are so cute when you think that calling people a name is an actual argument.

Warmists have changed data, lost data, refused to release data, released false and discredited "studies" and then try to say "consensus is science!"

You can't argue the facts as they are against you.

Anonymous said...

University of East Anglia and NASA, to name a couple, caught red handed manipulating data. When science does that it becomes nothing less than propaganda. Propaganda for what? Why for power, control and money of course. The notion of purchasing carbon credits should have been enough to early on clue us in on the scam. Well stupid is as stupid does and those who still believe this claptrap are stupid indeed.

Anonymous said...

Liberals, and this includes the worshipers of AGW, are like a box of chocolates. Never know what you're going to get, but it's sure to be old, stale and unappetizing.

Olaf Koenders said...

Anon 5:46, that's a lot of science you failed to dribble down your chin. Do you have any facts to base your diatribe on?

Meanwhile, many ex-astronauts have petitioned NASA GISS to stop fudging temperature data.