Monday, August 06, 2012



US Senate blocks Obama-backed cybersecurity bill

A cybersecurity bill sought by President Barack Obama as critical to American national defence was blocked Thursday in the Senate, drawing an angry response from the White House.

The legislation failed to advance amid opposition from an unusual coalition of civil libertarians  who feared it could allow too much government snooping, and conservatives who said it would create a new bureaucracy.

The bill needed 60 votes in the 100-member Senate to advance under rules in the chamber, but got only 52. The failure came despite pleas from Obama and top US defence officials.

Matt Kibbe of the conservative group FreedomWorks said the bill was "deeply flawed and would stifle innovation on the internet."

He said that by allowing the Department of Homeland Security to define what amounted to critical infrastructure it would "create a completely open-ended regulatory apparatus for Internet security."

A campaign launched by civil liberties groups argued that the bill "would let companies like Facebook and Google monitor our online communications and then pass that data to the government without a warrant."

Source

Background on the subject here.

12 comments:

  1. Anonymous1:57 AM

    Sadly, it's only a matter of time before some version of this bill is passed.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bird of Paradise2:26 AM

    SAY NO TO BIG BROTHER

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous2:42 AM

    SAY NO TO THE USA ACTING LIKE BIG BROTHER INSIDE AND OUTSIDE ITS OWN BORDERS!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous7:16 AM

    Obama is a liberal fascist plain and simple.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous7:35 AM

    The bill was very likely defeated because it had attached a section to ban high-capacity ammo magazines which many are opposed to.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Go Away Bird9:23 AM

    Get US out of the UNITED NATIONS and get the UNITED NATIONS out of America

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous12:28 PM

    "get the UNITED NATIONS out of America"

    You can go with them. No need for you here.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous4:00 PM

    "Would let companies like Facebook and Google monitor our online communications and then pass that data to the government without a warrant..."

    Oh, do you mean to say they don't already do that? In fact, they, and credit card companies/banks, know far more about us than the govt. ever could.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Go Away Bird5:47 PM

    Im Not Leaving

    ReplyDelete
  10. Use the Name, Luke2:41 AM

    Interesting that after being away a few days, I read this entry after reading about the U.S. decision to oppose permitting the U.N. to regulate the internet. It seems Obama wants that power all to himself.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous6:41 AM

    "It seems Obama wants that power all to himself."

    That's one person's belief.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Kee Bird1:41 AM

    King Fink Obama will simpley use his dictorial decrees and go over the heads of congress or the senate Aafter all it worked for HITLER and STALIN

    ReplyDelete

Comments in Chinese or Russian will be deleted as I do not understand them. Spammers: Don't bother. Irrelevant comments will not be published