Hate speech from Bloomberg
If he calls fat people "beasts" is it OK to call him a Fascist? Perhaps we could even call him a Kapo, after the Jews who assisted the Nazi concentration camp guards. If he can be offensive, so can we
Michael Bloomberg, Mayor of New York City and maven of medical-political quackery, decided to use the power of government to control the quantity of soft drinks people consume in eating establishments selling fountain drinks. An estimated 22,000 business entities would be affected, including restaurants, food carts, sports arenas, stadiums, theaters, and other public venues.
Bloomberg thinks “beasts” should be controlled. Those “beasts” are running rabidly rampant destroying the aesthetic of his beloved city. He is going to solve the problem of “beasts” in New York City. He claims the people want this.
Bloomberg’s mandate will limit sweetened fountain soft drink quantities to 16 ounces. He claims this will help curb obese “beasts.” He hates the sight of “beasts” and decided to beautify his city through downsizing soda.
Bloomberg blasted his critics calling them ridiculous. Has he looked in the mirror lately? Calling obese people “beasts” is not only ridiculous, it is insensitive and offensive. Mayor Bloomberg has an absolute unalienable right to call obese people “beasts.” This is still America, after all.
But, this being America, obese people, and the rest of us, should be protesting loudly about being called “beasts.” Where are the oh-so sensitive media? How come they are not all over this lashing out at Bloomberg for dehumanizing human beings by calling them “beasts”?
Source
Bloomberg and all leftists have to dehumanize their targets in order to "feel good" about what they are doing to them. If they acknowledged the humanity of their victims they would have to feel remorse and since that would make them "feel bad" they just simply refuse to do so.
ReplyDeleteThis is exactly how holocausts are generated and it's people like Bloomberg who would start another holocaust because they have the ability to objectify people and aren't afraid to use it.
It seems that Bloomberg became nasty after switching to the Republican Party / Independent. Just saying.
ReplyDeleteHa! That's a good one. Bloomberg is a demonkat through-and-through, right to his shriveled little heart.
ReplyDeleteI suppose next he will ban free refills. Then what? - bulk item stores. How about roasts? That is too much for one person to eat. And on, and on, and on ...
I'm just surprised he didn't tax them.
He'll profusely apologize and promise to step up his persecution of smokers.
ReplyDeleteoh wow - so as a local politician you can't say or do anything or else you're some kind of fascist!?
ReplyDeleteProhibition didn't work now did it?
ReplyDeletewhat a person decides to eat is between themselves and their body. remember be pro-choice when it comes to what your body can eat (and drink)
What selfish people can't get round or into their selfish brains is that their selfish activities ultimately impacts on the rest of society and even on their own families and neighborhoods!
ReplyDeleteBloomburg is a busybody who wants to stick his big fat nose into americans lives if he isnt trying to fore GUN CONTROL on us now he wants to regulate the size of our sodas. Frankly what he needs isa swift kick in the read
ReplyDeleteAnd who should know most about consuming + polluting the planet Earth than the biggest consumers and polluters of the Earth rel. to population and geograpicic area than - guess who - THE UNITIED STATES OF AMERICA (the filthy bastards!).
ReplyDeleteOkay if you like - "maggots" or "shitters in your own nest" - or your religion's self-fulfiling prophesy of planet-destroying Armageddon!
ReplyDeleteActually, this is a tax increase. It will also increase polution. In stead of a family getting one 44oz drink and 4 straws, they will now have to buy 4 separate drinks, in 4 containers at 2-3 times the price. So the city gets more sales tax and there is 2-3 times as much garbage.
ReplyDeleteAnother fine example of the law of unintended consequences brought to you by busybody politicians.
"step up his persecution of smokers"
ReplyDeleteThe persecution is self fulfilling. Smokers will die early. Oh well.
anon 3:23
ReplyDeleteso, if I believe going to concerts is a waste of our precious energy resources and people who go are selfish then I should be good on banning concerts. How about movie theaters? waste of energy driving to them? You could go on and on . Almost everything is selfish in one way or another. You're a scary fascist.
3:30 live and let live. Mind your own business and shut up.
ReplyDelete3:30 live and let live. Mind your own business and shut up.
ReplyDeleteIt's just a troll's way of getting attention, kinda like tweenie girls cutting themselves, but not as tough.
stinky,
ReplyDeleteLOL!
Okay if you like - "maggots" or "shitters in your own nest" - or your religion's self-fulfiling prophesy of planet-destroying Armageddon!
ReplyDeleteThat whooshing sound you heard? That was the irony flying over your head.
/your free education
Luke,
ReplyDeleteThanks. Maybe it's just me, but I often find that the funniest lines are the true ones, straight up.
Yet it is true that the US consumes and pollutes out of all proportion to its population and has for a long time - but of course being now caught up by the likes of China.
ReplyDeleteAnnon 3:30 CHINA is the worlds #1 poluter so GO POUND YOUR NUTSHELL HEAD AGAINST A TREE OR WALL
ReplyDeleteThank you Kee Bird - I guess China is also exceeding the US in public education (and civilized discourse)!
ReplyDeleteSo I assume you must be a nest-twin of the equally avian-brained "Bird of Paradise" show-off?
Annon 3:39 quit reading all the junk mail from the eco-wacko groups
ReplyDeleteHey FluBird,
ReplyDeleteI have some toxic waste to get rid of. Sounds like you would like to help me out. Tell me where you live and I will dump it in your front yard. We cool?
Try in annon 10:19 and youll get arrested
ReplyDeleteSo are Bird of Paradise, Kee Bird and Flu-bird actually one and the same bird sharing one and the same cell of an avian brain?
ReplyDelete