This may be Pat Condell's best yet
This blog is regularly backed up. See http://jonjayray.com/ttarc.html for an alternative to this site
Posts by John J. Ray (M.A.; Ph.D.)
This blog is regularly backed up. See http://jonjayray.com/ttarc.html for an alternative to this site
Posts by John J. Ray (M.A.; Ph.D.)
When you let down the draw-bridge; when you bring in the wooden-horse; when you expose yourself to viruses - your get attacked!
ReplyDeleteI am amazed that the authorities haven't shut him down on PC grounds. Everyone knows that you can't tell the truth in the UK and hope to get away with it for long.
ReplyDelete-btm
It's not the "authorities" but the islamists who are more likly to shut him up/down, and not in such a humane way either.
ReplyDeleteThis man really does speak the truth.
ReplyDeleteAs an American, I greatly fear what Sharia Law could do to the United States. The pervasive Politically Correct movement with its legal tolerance is coming closer and closer to allowing foreign or religious law the ability to trump U.S. Constitutional law. The acceptance of Sharia Law will come sooner than you think, and if you are a Christian, a Jew, or any non-Muslim, you had better understand that you will not be safe if Sharia Law is allowed to take hold.
I like some of Pat's videos, but what he doesn't understand is that multiculuralism is the direct result of atheism.
ReplyDeleteIf there is no God, then there is no absolute way by which to qualify behaviours and actions. It's not a coincidence that the greatest proponents of multiculturalism swing to atheism.
"If there is no God, then there is no absolute way by which to qualify behaviours and actions. "
ReplyDeleteThat is utter bullshit. Religion has not cornered the market on morality.
It's not a coincidence that the greatest proponents of multiculturalism swing to drinking water and breathing air.
Religion's concept of "absolute morality" is self-serving bs, and the so-called morality religious people often practise is dubious or contradictory.
ReplyDeleteAnd what is absolute morality when apparent absolutes are in conflict with each other in real situations. Who decides which injunction trumps another? In the end it becomes "situational ethics" by default.
ReplyDelete