Fair's fair
This blog is regularly backed up. See http://jonjayray.com/ttarc.html for an alternative to this site
Posts by John J. Ray (M.A.; Ph.D.)
This blog is regularly backed up. See http://jonjayray.com/ttarc.html for an alternative to this site
Posts by John J. Ray (M.A.; Ph.D.)
Interesting to see the picture from Vietnam with Bush's head superimposed or the one with the noose. Any thing remotely like this about Obama is sure to get a visit from the Secret Service and days on end of comment from the media.
ReplyDeleteDid these miserble little wanks ever repect RONALD REAGAN? certianly not look at how he was treated by the hollyweed crowd and usial liberal stand up comedians and such they these same little snots demand we show respect for OBAMA?! TELL THEM TO GO POUND SAND
ReplyDeleteShould anyone be surprised to find that those on the Left, the ones who demand total tolerance from everyone, have zero tolerance for anyone or anything they disagree with?
ReplyDeleteThe best way to neuter the Left is to treat them in the exact same way they treat their enemies.
QUOTABLE QUOTES
ReplyDelete"I rise today to express grave doubts about the Obama Administration's counterterrorism policies and programs. Counterterrorism is often shrouded in secrecy, as it should be, so let us judge by the results. In barely four years in office, five jihadists have reached their targets in the United States under Barack Obama: the Boston Marathon bomber, the underwear bomber, the Times Square Bomber, the Fort Hood shooter, and in my own state — the Little Rock recruiting office shooter. In the over seven years after 9/11 under George W. Bush, how many terrorists reached their target in the United States? Zero! We need to ask, 'Why is the Obama Administration failing in its mission to stop terrorism before it reaches its targets in the United States?'"
– Freshman Congressman Tom Cotton (R-AR)
Yeah!!
Hi colleagues, its fantastic paragraph about tutoringand
ReplyDeleteentirely explained, keep it up all the time.
my blog post: raspberry ketone diet
Sadly, this is no surprise.
ReplyDeleteThose who hate the First Amendment demand complete respect for their point of view while denouncing and silencing any opposing viewpoint.
The big difference is that Bush deserved to be mocked. After all, he started two wars, 911 happened on his watch, his Patriot Act took away constitutional freedoms, the economy cratered, torture was the norm, etc., etc., etc.
ReplyDeleteWell, of course US Presidents are seen differently from one succeeding generation to the next (as with all historical figures).
ReplyDeleteThere are other differences Anon 12:47. Bush was born in America, and unlike his successor, he's not a Marxist.
ReplyDelete"Bush was born in America, and unlike his successor, he's not a Marxist."
ReplyDeleteA typical anti-American birther.
The birther thing - who knows?
ReplyDeleteMarxist - definitely.
It was abundantly clear to anyone paying attention that Obama was not competent to be President before he was first nominated.
ReplyDelete2:32 - and Sara Palin was? LOL
ReplyDelete2:32 - IIRC Sarah Palin was running for vice president. A fact most liberals are unable to grasp.
ReplyDelete4:02 - So you do believe Obama was born outside the U.S. I'm still not certain.
The marxist thing - no question about it.
McCain was. Comparing Palin, you'll have to ask if you want Gaffie Joe as POTUS?
ReplyDeleteThe biggest problem with this poster is that there is no 'your' and 'my' president.
ReplyDeleteThe President is the President of the United States of America.
That makes him 'our' President (for all the Americans on here) whether you like him or not.
Of course, that does not mean you have to agree with everything he says.
It's a silly rule that a prospective President of the USA must be born within the current borders of same (which seem to get rather vague). Surely being a US citizen is enough to be both a voter and a candidate for any political office. (Or after being a citizen for a given number of years).
ReplyDeleteThe purpose for the President being required to be a natural born citizen is to avoid putting someone with divided loyalties into such a position of power.
ReplyDeleteSo Luke, with that logic, what do you make of second or third generation natural-born American citizens who often show as much or more loyalty to the country their recent forebears came from, such as Israel or Pakistan, etc., etc.?
ReplyDelete