Wednesday, November 26, 2008



Washington State regulators want to regulate bloggers

We read:
"Bloggers beware? State regulators are wondering whether online political activism amounts to lobbying, which could force Web-based activists to file public reports detailing their finances. In a collision of 21st century media and 1970s political reforms, the inquiry hints at a showdown over press freedoms for bloggers, whose self-published journals can shift between news reporting, opinion writing, political organizing and campaign fundraising.

State officials are downplaying any possible media rights conflict, pointing out that regulators have already exempted journalistic blogging from previous guidelines for online campaign activity.

But the blogosphere is taking the notion seriously. One prominent liberal blogger in Seattle is already issuing a dare - if the government wants David Goldstein to file papers as a lobbyist, it will have to take him to court. Goldstein, publisher of the widely read horsesass.org, wants to know how his political crusades could be subject to financial disclosures while newspaper writers, radio hosts and others in traditional media get a pass.

Source

7 comments:

  1. Anonymous3:35 AM

    I bet they don't even give DailyKos a first look though.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous4:20 AM

    I bet the Huffington Post gets a pass also.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous5:02 PM

    Don't worry, the so-called Fairness Doctrine will solve all this by allowing only the Left the ability to blog, comment, report, and discuss. Welcome to the new Amerika!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous7:39 PM

    Sounds like an idea copied from one that's currently being discussed in the European Parliament which would require bloggers (and anyone else "publishing content" on the internet) to have a license and submit their "work" for approval by EU "regulators" who will decide whether publication is allowed or not.

    The idea there is to "improve the quality of the internet by reducing the amount of lies and other untrue information being published", in other words to control what can be said so that only the official point of view of the EU central command gets any exposure.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous1:21 AM

    There are already laws regarding libel and slander.

    How about - when a newspaper makes a mistake, the correction must be printed/displayed as prominently as the original story?

    That may encourage some papers to be more thoughtful before making a bald statement, then posting a retraction on page Z-32 in 4 pt type.

    ReplyDelete

Comments in Chinese or Russian will be deleted as I do not understand them. Spammers: Don't bother. Irrelevant comments will not be published